Re: RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-14 Thread Ian
w.e2chameleon.btinternet.co.uk ---Original Message--- From: Storch, Beau Date: 07 August 2003 22:57:39 To: 'Greg Hall'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Anit-Virus Software On another similar note, does anyone have any recommendations for a AV appliance to sit next to my fi

Re: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-14 Thread Chris Berry
From: "Dave C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John I've had good luck with Norton Corp SAV. So have I, it works very well. And if your users are a little more tech savvy, you can create a webpage for them to install their own client. That's not even necessary, Norton Corporate can install all the clients re

RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-14 Thread stephen at unix dot za dot net
NAV is too heavy performance wise, the difference between NAV loaded and unloaded is very noticeable, whereas with trend pc-cillion or officescan corp edition, the machine runs as if NAV isn't running.. not arguing, NAV is a nice product, i just find it way too heavy on resources compared to Tren

RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-14 Thread Jeff Wichman
se Manager from Sophos, I feel it is a great product. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anit-Virus Software Cost is probably going to be a f

Re: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-14 Thread Justin_Andrusk
Cost is probably going to be a factor. Mcafee has a product in addition to VirusScan that you can use to manage all hosts from a single console. It's E-Policy Orchestrator. I don't believe Sophos has anything except reporting. Not sure about Trend Micro. If you want to be adventurous, you can mana

Re: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-14 Thread Ian
n. e2chameleon Information Security Resource. http://www.e2chameleon.btinternet.co.uk - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:06 PM Subject: Re: Anit-Virus Software > > Cost i

Re: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-14 Thread greg.jensen
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:13 PM Subject: RE: Anit-Virus Software > I have to second this. I have used McAfee, CA Etrust, Norton, and Trend > Micro. I have to say that I prefer Trend Micro over all of the others. > It is much easier to manage and causes the

Re: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cost is probably going to be a factor. Mcafee has a product in addition to VirusScan that you can use to manage all hosts from a single console. It's E-Policy Orchestrator. I don't believe Sophos has anything except reporting. sophos has since a *really* long time savadmi

RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-14 Thread Kenneth W. Kubiak
Hey John. My organization has had Norton Corporate Edition running for well over a year now, protecting over 100 workstations and 7 servers. Not that you should ever become complacent about virus', but knowing I have NAVCE protecting me has really helped ease my worries in that area! It's jus

RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-12 Thread Dave Gonsalves
John, I have been working with Norton AV now called Symantec AV for a couple of years. It has done a very good job keeping us clean aside from the Nimda outbreak. We use their email gateway product along with the Anti-virus client for exchange. It was very easy to set up and deploy. I manage 600

RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-10 Thread JAVIER OTERO
Try Trend Micro, has the features you ask. Ing. Fco. Javier Otero De Alba Grupo Smartekh Antivirus Expertos Bussiness Continuity Inftegrity 5243-4782 al 84 Ext.300 México, D.F. -Mensaje original- De: John Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Martes, 05 de Agosto de 2003 0

RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-10 Thread Brian Whitehead
I have to second this. I have used McAfee, CA Etrust, Norton, and Trend Micro. I have to say that I prefer Trend Micro over all of the others. It is much easier to manage and causes the least number of problems on the client machines. Stay away from CA's Etrust product. It is by far the worst

RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-09 Thread subscribe
NAV on clients, Trend on servers. --- Trond -Original Message- From: John Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 5. august 2003 21:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Anit-Virus Software I need to set up some anti-virus software for our company. We have about 15 people running windows

Re: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-09 Thread Robert Mezzone
t -Original Message- From: Kenneth W. Kubiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wed Aug 06 12:49:47 2003 Subject: RE: Anit-Virus Software Hey John. My organization has had Norton Corporate Edition running for well over a year now, protecting over

Re: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-08 Thread Ermelir
x27;s butt anyday. 2cents M -Original Message- From: Justin F. Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Anit-Virus Software In the field, I have worked with McAfee, CA, Symantec (Norton) and Trend Micro. I'll have

RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-08 Thread Marc Suttle
Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Anit-Virus Software In the field, I have worked with McAfee, CA, Symantec (Norton) and Trend Micro. I'll have to agree re: CA. CA's software is klunky, and causes no end of frustrati

Re: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-08 Thread Karma
se to deploy it, a good admin is far better than a neglected but good AV scanner. regards - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:06 AM Subject: Re: Anit-Virus Software > > C

RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-07 Thread Storch, Beau
On another similar note, does anyone have any recommendations for a AV appliance to sit next to my firewall? -Original Message- From: Greg Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 7:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Anit-Virus Software I would defiantly

Re: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-07 Thread J. Lambrecht
esday, August 06, 2003 6:49 PM Subject: RE: Anit-Virus Software > Hey John. > > My organization has had Norton Corporate Edition running for well over a year now, protecting over 100 workstations and 7 servers. Not that you should ever become complacent about virus', but knowing I h

Re: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-07 Thread greg.jensen
Well, that is kind of the reason why those that bought eTrust AV, did sobecause it leverages two AV engines. - Original Message - From: "Kenneth W. Kubiak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:49 AM Subject: RE: Anit-

RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-07 Thread Greg Hall
Anit-Virus Software Subject: RE: Anit-Virus Software I have to second this. I have used McAfee, CA Etrust, Norton, and Trend Micro. I have to say that I prefer Trend Micro over all of the others. It is much easier to manage and causes the least number of problems on the client machines. Stay

RE: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-07 Thread Justin F. Knox
all clients connected/configured). Least interference I've seen, with regards to end user experience. hth Justin -Original Message- From: Brian Whitehead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Anit-Virus Software I have to second

Re: Anit-Virus Software

2003-08-06 Thread Dave C
John I've had good luck with Norton Corp SAV. And if your users are a little more tech savvy, you can create a webpage for them to install their own client. Dave - Original Message - From: "John Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:28 PM