PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Remote access solution
>From: "Mike Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>One thing to keep in mind when using VNC is that even though the inital
>authentication may be secure, anything you t
From: Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As well, you can limit who can connect to the system by allowing only
certain IP's to connect.
Hey, that's cool, how do you do that?
Chris Berry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator
JM Associates
"Linux and I have a love/hate relationship. I hate its comp
From: "Mike Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One thing to keep in mind when using VNC is that even though the inital
authentication may be secure, anything you type while controlling the
computer is sent in plain text. So, if you were to connect to a windows
machine, for example, then login to or un
]
Subject: Re: Remote access solution
>From: "Nuzman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Maybe I'm just not current on VNC, but the last version I saw had no way to
>secure who can access the host. It was a simple connect to IP without any
>authentication. Would you want anyone on the
ing a product stinks with no explanation doesn't
have any merit. As Chris suggested, VNC through a VPN or SSH will
satisfy most security worries.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 24, 2003 15:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Remote acces
One thing to keep in mind when using VNC is that even though the inital
authentication may be secure, anything you type while controlling the
computer is sent in plain text. So, if you were to connect to a windows
machine, for example, then login to or unlock the screen on that machine ,
that
> >From: "Nuzman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Maybe I'm just not current on VNC, but the last version I saw had no way to
> >secure who can access the host. It was a simple connect to IP without any
> >authentication. Would you want anyone on the wire to be able to connect to
> >a
> >system running the
From: "Nuzman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Maybe I'm just not current on VNC, but the last version I saw had no way to
secure who can access the host. It was a simple connect to IP without any
authentication. Would you want anyone on the wire to be able to connect to
a
system running the host?
That would
From: "Nuzman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Stay away from VNC for any but the most casual and temporary remote
access circumstances.
Why would you recommend that, I was under the impression that while it
doesn't have much built in security, running it through ssh and/or a vpn was
considered to be quite s
l and temporary remote access
circumstances.
Norris Carden
www.rasquel.com
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: Remote access solution
> One product I've heard of is Neoteris, http:/
From: Orlando J. Cano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have recently been assigned to join efforts with our Network group in
coming up with a secure remote access solution for our Network. This
will involve accessing servers in our DMZ. I was wondering if this
securityfocus community could elaborate
egards,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Orlando J. Cano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Remote access solution
I have recently been assigned to join efforts with our Network group in
coming up with a secure remote access s
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Remote access solution
I have recently been assigned to join efforts with our Network group in
coming up with a secure remote access solution for our Network. This
will involve accessing servers in our DMZ. I was wondering if this
securityfocus community could elabor
>>Yes, but the fact that it's handy (Win remote desktop) doesn't change the fact that
you have to expose lots of nasty, easy to exploit ports in ways that aren't trivial to
fix (ACL's work, but if we're looking for BASIC, hardly an easy solution).
Just one port, TCP 3389.
LJS
to point him. Exposes 1 port, well known and reviewed
code, easy updates. Unlike the Microsoft solution.
My opinion only.
Original Message:
-
From: Trevor Cushen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:28:26 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Remote
From: "Daniel R. Miessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For command line administration of *nix machines you should use SSH.
openssh has a port for windows too, VNC has it's uses, but I'd only
recommend it for in house stuff.
Chris Berry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator
JM Associates
"For Sys Ad
iginal Message-
From: Orlando J. Cano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Remote access solution
I have recently been assigned to join efforts with our Network group
in coming up with a secure remote access solution for our N
I have recently been assigned to join efforts with our Network group in coming up with
a secure remote access solution for our Network. This will involve accessing servers
in our DMZ. I was wondering if this securityfocus community could elaborate on how
secure VNC, Freevision or Terminal
18 matches
Mail list logo
