At 08:06 AM 1/31/2003 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
of AT&T UK Labs. My understanding is that VNC development was frozen a long
time ago. AT&T recently disbanded this entity (according to the Register of
some months ago) I believe some of the pieces reverted to Olivetti, but I
heard t
a time. Other than that I have found the app very satisfactory.
Spencer
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Cushen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VNC
Further Chris Berrys suggestion is the use of stunnel or tightv
http://www.realvnc.com
Same set of developers, just have their own domain now.
j- k-
On Friday 31 January 2003 04:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> First, I'm confused about how there can be a new version. VNC was a project
> of AT&T UK Labs. My understanding is that VNC
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> heard that they had no plans for VNC. Did some former employees take it
> over to continue development? There is a Windows-only product that we use
www.realvnc.com
Yes. :)
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 13:08, Marty wrote:
> My question is simple is the latest version of VNC better than the
> previous ones and should we allow our tech group to use it to take
> control of our machines (servers and workstations)...
I highly suggest running VNC over an SSH tunnel -- i
From: Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I remember inquiring last year about VNC as a network remote control
solution. Sincere thanks to all those that answered. We stopped the VNC
implementation after reading about all the risks related to the
product.
Our tech people are coming back and ch
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:08 PM
To: Marty; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC
We are starting to use gotomypc as a replacement for our checkpoint
vpn. See
article:
http://www.nwfusion.com/net.worker/columnists/2001/0820kistner.html
- --- Marty <[EM
Megan Golding wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 13:08, Marty wrote:
My question is simple is the latest version of VNC better than the
previous ones and should we allow our tech group to use it to take
control of our machines (servers and workstations)...
I highly suggest running VNC over an
:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC
>From: Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I remember inquiring last year about VNC as a network remote control
>solution. Sincere thanks to all those that answered. We stopped the VNC
>implementation after reading about all the risks relate
We also use it on occasion, but install use and uninstall immediately after
use.
Nuzman
- Original Message -
From: "Clark, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:26 PM
Subject: RE: VNC
> Marty,
>
> I use T
First, I'm confused about how there can be a new version. VNC was a project
of AT&T UK Labs. My understanding is that VNC development was frozen a long
time ago. AT&T recently disbanded this entity (according to the Register of
some months ago) I believe some of the pieces reverte
We are starting to use gotomypc as a replacement for our checkpoint vpn. See
article:
http://www.nwfusion.com/net.worker/columnists/2001/0820kistner.html
--- Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember inquiring last year about VNC as a network remote control
>
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: VNC
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 13:08, Marty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember inquiring last year about VNC as a network remote control
> solution. Sincere thanks to all those that answered. We stopped the
> VNC implementation after reading about all the
Marty,
I use Tight VNC on the internal LAN in the small offices I manage as it's
easy to use and deploy. It allows for real time access to a PC that is
having problems (usually user related) without having to make the trip.
Keeping in mind the security issues - plain text password etc..., it
Hi,
I remember inquiring last year about VNC as a network remote control
solution. Sincere thanks to all those that answered. We stopped the VNC
implementation after reading about all the risks related to the product.
Our tech people are coming back and charging... again.
My question is simple
Message-
From: Zack Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VNC + Netgear RT311
I'm having trouble forwarding the ports used by VNC with a Netgear RT311.
The FW shows the packets as open (when stealth scanning), and the packets
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Zack Johnson wrote:
> I'm having trouble forwarding the ports used by VNC with a Netgear RT311.
> The FW shows the packets as open (when stealth scanning), and the packets
> seem to forward. However, VNC cannot establish a session. All works fine
> within
I'm having trouble forwarding the ports used by VNC with a Netgear RT311.
The FW shows the packets as open (when stealth scanning), and the packets
seem to forward. However, VNC cannot establish a session. All works fine
within the local network. I've searched through all of th
18 matches
Mail list logo
