Re: [Sip-implementors] Call-id length

2013-07-18 Thread Jan Bollen
Hi there, Most probably the indicated length of the "call-id" is rather an imposed limitation of the concerned manufacturer for its product - IBM's Websphere and Microsofts MS-Turn, quote "This protocol is a proprietary extension to the Traversal Using Relay NAT (TURN)

Re: [Sip-implementors] Call-id length

2013-07-18 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Not only does sip have no maximum callid length, it has no bound on the length of most things in the message. Of course you can usually control the length of things that you originate, but you must not impose a limit on those you receive if you want to be interoperable. Just get it through your

Re: [Sip-implementors] Call-id length

2013-07-18 Thread ikuzar RABE
Ok, thanks for these responses. I 'd like to add this: In RFC 3261 page 38 it is said: Use of cryptographically random identifiers (RFC 1750 [12]) in the generation of Call-IDs is RECOMMENDED. in RFC 1750 8.2.3 it is said : probably a good minimum for a very high security cryptographic ke

Re: [Sip-implementors] Call-id length

2013-07-18 Thread Brett Tate
> 1) Why don't we have this info in RFC 3261? > What does RFC says about max Call-id length? SIP has no maximum Call-ID length. > 2) What about it actually? > Today I put my call-id max length to 256 characters > but I am not sure if it is correct ... You can impose a maximum; however that me

Re: [Sip-implementors] Call-id length

2013-07-18 Thread Joel Gerber
241 -Original Message- From: ikuzar RABE [mailto:ikuzar9...@gmail.com] Sent: July-18-13 8:01 AM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Call-id length Hi all, I found with the link below (IBM) that Call-id max length is 256 characters: http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infoc

[Sip-implementors] Call-id length

2013-07-18 Thread ikuzar RABE
Hi all, I found with the link below (IBM) that Call-id max length is 256 characters: http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/wvraix/v6r1m0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.wvraix.voip.doc%2Fsiptags.html Microsoft said the same: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff595864%28v=office.12%29.aspx. 1) Why do