and they just announced g722 support...
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:26 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:09:22 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
>> They don't think Ethernet overhead. After you wrap the packet its 32k. Why
>> would you care what their sales monkey says?
>
> I don't a
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:09:22 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> They don't think Ethernet overhead. After you wrap the packet its 32k. Why
> would you care what their sales monkey says?
I don't and I'm tired of his rude and know it all attitude so I've given up on
them after wasting months of my time.
They don't think Ethernet overhead. After you wrap the packet its 32k. Why
would you care what their sales monkey says?
On Jul 11, 2012 9:28 AM, "m...@grounded.net" wrote:
> > Appia doesn't hard code the codecs at all (if they limited it to G.729,
> > AA/VM wouldnt work...its ulaw only). Rather
> Appia doesn't hard code the codecs at all (if they limited it to G.729,
> AA/VM wouldnt work...its ulaw only). Rather its negotiated via the SDP.
> They allow both g729 and G711u. So you can choose your codec based on what
> you allow via sipxbridge and the codec order in the endpoint.
It's s
>>> "m...@grounded.net" 07/03/12 2:09 PM >>>
>> Your biggest question is what to use for your internet connection. If they
>> will have 24 simultaneous calls your looking at about 2048 KB if using
>> G.711U (86KB with payload plus overhead). Which means you will need to
>> move to G.729 to fit
> Your biggest question is what to use for your internet connection. If they
> will have 24 simultaneous calls your looking at about 2048 KB if using
> G.711U (86KB with payload plus overhead). Which means you will need to
> move to G.729 to fit your max call bandwidth inside a T1.
Appia told
users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 12:57 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunking Gateway
I'll ditto the price preference on that call volume. We w
I'll ditto the price preference on that call volume. We would prefer not to
deal with trunk or internet quality if we don't have to.
On Jul 3, 2012 12:27 PM, "Matt White" wrote:
> Sipxbridge is more than capable of handling 24 simultaneous calls through
> a siptrunk if the hardware has decent spe
-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tommy Laino
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 9:20 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] SIP Trunking Gateway
I am recommending a SipX to a customer. They are going to be converting from
PRI to SIP trunking. They want to have 24 trunks availabl
Sipxbridge is more than capable of handling 24 simultaneous calls through a
siptrunk if the hardware has decent specs ie...at least dual core and 8GB of
ram.
We use Appia for all deployments. The load you noted here will be fine. they
offer trunks with or without T1's.
Your biggest question
I am recommending a SipX to a customer. They are going to be
converting from PRI to SIP trunking. They want to have 24
trunks available for calls. I am assuming that the internal
SipX bridge is not going to be sufficient for the amount of
calls that they are looking to handle. I am looking for
re
11 matches
Mail list logo
