This statement was made by Tom Broeski and it was made as a SARCASTIC
remark and he of course did not mean it. It was a remark made to try to
make his point about having more than two classes (sport and expert) in
the ESL contests. He is for more levels so he made the comment about
why the need f
At the beginning of this thread someone wrote:
<>
I'd like to address that.
The early levels of the LSF program are pretty easy for an experienced pilot but they
do require participation. This is a place where the experienced pilot can get together
with less experienced flyers and together w
Paul & Rickie Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:36 PM
Subject: [RCSE] CONTESTS and LSF LEVELS
>Paul Ferguson posted to Jim Thomas in regards to 'Contests and LSF Levels,'
>"Perhaps we need
Paul Ferguson posted to Jim Thomas in regards to 'Contests and LSF Levels,'
"Perhaps we need to leave the existing levels alone and add parallel
'non-contest' levels with more challenging tasks."
SOUNDS LIKE!! LSF AWARDS with a nasty " * " attached to me :-) !! Maybe,
Paul, as a disintereste
d add parallel
"non-contest" levels with more challenging tasks.
Paul Ferguson
Adelaide, Australia
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 10:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [RCSE] Contest
Gents,
To all those that either don't see the point of having competition goals
as part of LSF, or don't think they should have to compete and SUCCEED
in competition as part of the LSF program, I have something to say.
Don't get involved in LSF in the first place if you aren't willing to
play by
6 matches
Mail list logo
