> The 9C may have it's shortcomings but at a price point roughly 1/3
> of the EVO it offers a great deal of functionality, particularly to
> someone like myself, making the move from park flying to more
> serious T&D.
It's a lot more than that!
I have had the 8uaf, 8uafs and now the 9C. It is so c
o.
Maurice
> - Original Message -
> From: ahearn_dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Maurice Podder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 8:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [RCSE] Futaba 9C Is A Disaster For Sailplanes
>
>
> > Maurice could you share your landing checklist?
ROTECTED]>
To: Maurice Podder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Futaba 9C Is A Disaster For Sailplanes
> Maurice could you share your landing checklist?
>
>
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Maurice Podder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
The Hmmm...the 8U also as butterfly fixed on switch A. I never had a
problem with it. It would be nice if it were assignable, but calling it a
disaster seems a bit over the top, IMO.
At 07:27 AM 7/28/03 -0700, JEREMY BUSHELL wrote:
>Landing a sailplane is always safety-critical but
>never more s
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RCSE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:27 AM
Subject: [RCSE] Futaba 9C Is A Disaster For Sailplanes
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane
5 matches
Mail list logo
