In a message dated 8/17/01 1:07:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Hi Bob,
> One of my objectives in proposing the RES class was to provide aircraft such
> as that a class in which to fly.
Yes, I think RES has gotten away from the original intent.
The SAM guys have some good
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stan & Mary Jo Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Nostalgia--why modify??
> Stan,
>
> Nice looking plane! You have sheeted more than what I did with the stock
> kit. Looks very slee
As you travel the soaring circuit, you'll notice that many people just gotta
fiddle with the norm. Sailaires with flaps, Gentle Ladies with bullet-proof
wings, etc. While I admire the purists -- I fly a dead-stock Sailaire whose
wing is as light as they get, and nearly touches tip-to-tip on a wi
At 11:22 PM 8/15/2001 EDT, you wrote:
>The philosophy of Nostalgia is to fly the old planes as they were
designed. The pure joy (or joy??) of seeing history in the air is the prime
ingredient--NOT THE COMPETITION!
>
>We should learn from the controlline stunt guys. At their Vintage Stunt
Champion
The philosophy of Nostalgia is to fly the old planes as they were designed. The pure
joy (or joy??) of seeing history in the air is the prime ingredient--NOT THE
COMPETITION!
We should learn from the controlline stunt guys. At their Vintage Stunt Championships
everyone is there to compete but
5 matches
Mail list logo