In a message dated 10/31/02 1:03:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, CL afficionados would say the same about HLG: throw it, catch
it, throw it, catch it, , oops pick it up, throw it, ...
Am I missing the word FLY in there somewhere? :-) Bill G.
'm ready!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Rense Lange [mailto:renselange@;earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Howard Mark
Subject: RE: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column
Of course, CL afficionado
d Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 10/31/2002 11:54:52 AM
> Subject: RE: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column
>
> If you go to hell - then you have to fly control line
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column
Regarding soaring and AMA our greater number of entries in most of the
recent NATS has not really acknowledged by AMA. RC pattern and Pylon seem to
be the sweetheart events. Possibly because they spend a lot more
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Mike Garton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The abundance of CL in Model Aviation can be explained.
> Content editor, Bob Hunt, is a hardcore CL guy.
> The unbalanced space allotments bother me.
> I have exchanged emails with Bob and he honestly
> believes that CL is at
5 matches
Mail list logo
