Hmm, seems I was one day too early with my nightly then:p
Quote from Chris (2009-08-20 17:04):
"i changed it to be manufacturedate_dt since that fits with the existing
scheme ... the data is all made up, but so is all hte rest of our data."
seems like lucene.apache.org is down at the moment but wi
Thanks for the reply Yonik!
I'm using the nightly from 2009-08-20, so its a rather fresh build. And by
comparing the schema with the one im using now I had made a mistake when
defining the field.
By examining the most recent build, i noticed that the normal date field is
defined as follows:
(its a
I can't reproduce any problem.
Are you using a recent nightly build?
See the example schema of a recent nightly build for the correct way
to define a Trie based field - the article / blog may be out of date.
Here's what I used to test the example data:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=manufact
Hello everyone,
after reading Grant's article about TrieRange capabilities on the lucid blog
I did some experimenting, but I have some trouble with the tdate type and I
was hoping that you guys could point me in the right direction.
So, basically I index a regular solr date field and use that for s
