Kevin Arhelger wrote:
Hello,
I'm a lab manager for about 50 machines at a University.
My question is if I can use Fedora Core 7 Clients with my Spacewalk .4
installation.
I've found the src.rpm's for Fedora Core 9 and am in the process of
building them on Fedora Core 7.
Are there any issues I m
Hello,
I'm a lab manager for about 50 machines at a University.
My question is if I can use Fedora Core 7 Clients with my Spacewalk .4
installation.
I've found the src.rpm's for Fedora Core 9 and am in the process of
building them on Fedora Core 7.
Are there any issues I might run into going this
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 06:08:33PM -0700, Brian Kosick wrote:
Errm nevermind I had to re-add the pam_auth_service = rhn-satellite
line to rhn.conf
Did you lose this during an upgrade?
Yeah, I upgraded from 0.3 to 0.4 yesterday
Milan, maybe we could add an explic
John Hodrien wrote:
A test box that previously had 0.3 installed on it has been upgraded to 0.4,
although when I say upgraded, I first tried an upgrade but when this didn't
look entirely right (kickstart profiles were causing the errors experienced
below and there was a spurious cobblered non-spa
Hi All,
I discovered what I think may be a bug.
When I go to Manage Software channels, and Expand/Collapse a channel
tree, the parent channel disappears from the channels list!
So something like this
Fedora 10
Redhat 5.2
Expand
Fedora 10
- Fedora 10 32bit
- Fedora 10 64bit
Redhat 5.2
Colla
Michiel van Es wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I changed the .sql file or removed the .sql file but what then?
> If I run
> [r...@devmx01 spacewalk-0.3-spacewalk-0.4]#
> /usr/bin/spacewalk-schema-upgrade
> Unknown schema name [no rows selected] found.
>
> How can I proceed with the upgrade from 0.3 to 0.4?
>
>
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Santi Saez wrote:
AFAIK, threre is not package upgrades in "base" repo.. So my question is: we
need to make a new channel for "updates"? Or perhaps it's better uploading
package upgrades to "base" channel directly.. what method do you use, one or
two channels? thanks!
Tw
Hi,
I have some doubts when configuring software channels in our Spacewalk
infrastucture. We have followed those steps:
- Create a channel for CentOS 5 "base" packages, name "centos5-base-x86"
- Using "reposync" packages are stored at "/root/centos5-base-x86":
reposync --repoid=base
On Monday 19 January 2009 19:54:19 romain.peliss...@bell.ca wrote:
> Hi,
> I have testes the upgrade process and it fails with the schema upgrade.
> Le log show :
>
> 'SPACEWALK-SCHEMA-0.3-TO-SPACEWALK-SCHEMA-0.4/156-RHNPACKAGE-COMPAT-NUMBER.
>SQ
> --
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 06:08:33PM -0700, Brian Kosick wrote:
> > >
> > > Errm nevermind I had to re-add the pam_auth_service = rhn-satellite
> > > line to rhn.conf
> >
> > Did you lose this during an upgrade?
>
> Yeah, I upgraded from 0.3 to 0.4 yesterday
Milan, maybe we could add an
10 matches
Mail list logo