Rob Becker wrote:
% I got the same with RHEL5.3. The system was registered with RHN, so I'm
% kinda confused on why it didn't pull down the dependent files from
% there.
# yum resolvedep 'perl(Cache::FileCache)'
Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security
epel
On 08/10/2009 05:39 PM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
Andy Speagle wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 16:50 -0500, Mike McCune wrote:
every kickstart profile in Spacewalk has a default activation key
used
with it, the 1st one you are seeing is the one associated with the
profile, the 2nd is your custom key.
Andy Speagle wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 16:50 -0500, Mike McCune wrote:
>> every kickstart profile in Spacewalk has a default activation key
>> used
>> with it, the 1st one you are seeing is the one associated with the
>> profile, the 2nd is your custom key.
>>
>> Mike
>
> Hmmm... ok then.
On 08/10/2009 03:36 PM, Galia Lisovskaya wrote:
Hi all,
I get some problems when I install Spacewalk on test KVM virtual macine.
I was try install it in last week, before Spacewalk 6 released.
I every get one problem:
[snip]
Now, after installation, SQL-user spacewalk don't have access to
Orac
Hi all,
I get some problems when I install Spacewalk on test KVM virtual macine.
I was try install it in last week, before Spacewalk 6 released.
I every get one problem:
http://fpaste.org/56g2/
(Tomcat failed to start properly or the installer ran out of tries.
Please check /var/log/tomcat5/catal
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 16:50 -0500, Mike McCune wrote:
> every kickstart profile in Spacewalk has a default activation key
> used
> with it, the 1st one you are seeing is the one associated with the
> profile, the 2nd is your custom key.
>
> Mike
Hmmm... ok then. Any idea why I can't get the sy
On 08/10/2009 11:04 AM, Andy Speagle wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:51 -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote:
Second key? Can you post what you see there (the full output from
"cobbler profile report --name=foo") ?
Sure thing...
# cobbler profile report
profile :
rhel-x86_64-server-5-3-
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:51 -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Second key? Can you post what you see there (the full output from
> "cobbler profile report --name=foo") ?
Sure thing...
# cobbler profile report
profile :
rhel-x86_64-server-5-3-default:1:Spacewalk-Public-Cert
distro
On 08/10/2009 12:55 PM, Andy Speagle wrote:
Hi Team,
I'm coming up with a weird issue with one of my cobbler distributions.
When I kickstart a system using this distro, it fails to register. What
I've found by doing a:
cobbler profile report
Is that this distro has a second key in the "redhat
On Monday 10 August 2009 17:55:25 Albert Bryndza wrote:
> According to:
>
> http://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/HowToUpgrade
>
> We need to upgrade monitoring. But, this file doesn't exist:
>
> /usr/share/spacewalk/setup/upgrade/rhn-update-monitoring.pl
>
> I followed all the upgrade steps to t
(Early adopters pay the price..)
As previously stated, this script doesn't exist:
/usr/share/spacewalk/setup/upgrade/rhn-update-monitoring.pl
The login page looks different, so SOMETHING must have changed.
At the bottom of each page, it still says Spacewalk release 0.5, not 0.6.
Managing chann
Hi Team,
I'm coming up with a weird issue with one of my cobbler distributions.
When I kickstart a system using this distro, it fails to register. What
I've found by doing a:
cobbler profile report
Is that this distro has a second key in the "redhat mgmt key" field. I
don't know where this com
I got the same with RHEL5.3. The system was registered with RHN, so I'm
kinda confused on why it didn't pull down the dependent files from
there.
-Rob
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:11 -0400, Jeff Moody wrote:
> When trying to do a clean install of Spacewalk 0.6 on a i386 fresh
> install of CentOS 5.3
When trying to do a clean install of Spacewalk 0.6 on a i386 fresh install of
CentOS 5.3, I get the following:
Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Cache::FileCache) is needed by package
spacewalk-pxt-0.6.19-1.el5.noarch (spacewalk)
Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Params::Validate) is needed by packa
According to:
http://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/HowToUpgrade
We need to upgrade monitoring. But, this file doesn't exist:
/usr/share/spacewalk/setup/upgrade/rhn-update-monitoring.pl
I followed all the upgrade steps to the T. Did a search on the box. No go.
Help?
AB
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The spacewalk-repo rpm has a typo in the url for the fedora repos.
The url should have Fedora not fedora in it. If you are having
problems accessing the Fedora repos simply update your spacewalk.repo
file located in /etc/yum.repos.d/.
http://spacewalk
Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howdy Spacewalkers,
Spacewalk 0.6 is finally here! In a few hours, Spacewalk 0.6 will be
...
Features & Enhancements
I would add:
* monitoring is functional again (after several releases with problems
in this part)
17 matches
Mail list logo
