On 04/21/2011 06:08 PM, William S. wrote:
> The issue is that we need to be able to provision hosts in each site, as I
> understand it, proxy would not have the kickstart/DHCPD capability. It is
> enough to do rpm distribution, we need to be able to provision hosts as
> well. If the proxy isn't cap
But proxies can do provision and provide dhcp
On 21/04/11 17:08, William S. wrote:
Perhaps I should elaborate :)
The issue is that we need to be able to provision hosts in each site, as I
understand it, proxy would not have the kickstart/DHCPD capability
Perhaps I should elaborate :)
The issue is that we need to be able to provision hosts in each site, as I
understand it, proxy would not have the kickstart/DHCPD capability. It is
enough to do rpm distribution, we need to be able to provision hosts as
well. If the proxy isn't capable of provisioni
On 04/21/2011 05:43 PM, William S. wrote:
> We're going to use spacewalk in the hub and spoke model. That being said,
> what are the limitations to the proxy servers? Is it possible to run
> Spacewalk master server in a distributed model in multiple geographical
> locations? This would be like a Ma
We're going to use spacewalk in the hub and spoke model. That being said,
what are the limitations to the proxy servers? Is it possible to run
Spacewalk master server in a distributed model in multiple geographical
locations? This would be like a Master/Master model where the main server
will distr
Trevor T Kates wrote:
% List:
%
% Spacewalk Ver: 1.4-RC
% OS Ver: CentOS 5.6
%
% The following error is generated when attempting to sync to a Fedora 14
updates repo
% which has errata. There are currently no erratum attached to the channel on
my server
% configured to sync to the Fedora 14 upd
