From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:10:46 -0500
> Here you go. Doesn't seem to make much difference. The only difference I
> see is this:
>
> ESP: tgt[0] lun[0] scsi_cmd [ 12 00 00 00 24 c2 ]
I need to have my head examined :-)
Please try this patch:
dif
From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:10:46 -0500
> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 16:10 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:18:59 -0500
> >
> > > Tried the new esp driver on an SparcStation 4,
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 16:10 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:18:59 -0500
>
> > Tried the new esp driver on an SparcStation 4, with not much luck.
> >
> > If you are willing to tackle this, and want esp_debug, please let me
From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:18:59 -0500
> Tried the new esp driver on an SparcStation 4, with not much luck.
>
> If you are willing to tackle this, and want esp_debug, please let me
> know.
I need esp_debug info, the very first command fails :)
I b
From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:18:59 -0500
> Tried the new esp driver on an SparcStation 4, with not much luck.
>
> If you are willing to tackle this, and want esp_debug, please let me
> know.
Thanks, this dump should be good enough for now, I think I
From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:10:32 -0500
> While building a test kernel for the new esp driver (against
> git-current), I hit this bug. Trivial fix, put the inline declaration
> in the right place. :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom "spot" Callaway <[EMAIL PR
From: Pasi Pirhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:59:23 +0300
> Something else? Long term stability and some _real_ I/O load is still
> something to be tested ..
Thanks a lot for the testing and the info, I really appreciate
it.
If something goes wrong, do report it, and if n
From: Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:27:18 +0300 (EEST)
> > Does this patch make the problem go away? If not, please send
> > me the new kernel log message and a copy of the
> > net/sunrpc/svcsock.o object file from the build.
>
> Fixed the messages for me, thanks!
Th
From: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:11:04 +0200
> Hmm:
> entry.S:linux_sparc_syscall32 zero-extends (srl) %o3 (and others) and
> calls sys32.S:sys32_ipc, which sign-extends (sra) %o3 (and others)
> and jumps to compat_sys_ipc(), which passes %o3 on as-is to an
> u
Tried the new esp driver on an SparcStation 4, with not much luck.
If you are willing to tackle this, and want esp_debug, please let me
know.
SCSI subsystem initialized
Loading sd_mod.ko module
Loading scsi_transport_spi.ko module
Loading esp.ko module
scsi0 : esp
esp: esp0 found
at /[EMAIL PROTE
Caught this one building the sparc64 SMP kernel. Makes me wonder whether
my compiler (gcc version 4.1.1 20060629) is being oversensitive (or if
DaveM uses an older compiler which is less picky about inline ordering).
Signed-off-by: Tom "spot" Callaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.20.sparc64/
While building a test kernel for the new esp driver (against
git-current), I hit this bug. Trivial fix, put the inline declaration
in the right place. :)
Signed-off-by: Tom "spot" Callaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.20.sparc64/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_iommu.c.BAD 2007-04-13 12:35:59.00
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:33:50PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> I've been putting off posting this, since people seem to get a little
> upset when they lose their filesystems, but it passes all of my tests
> on an Ultra2 so what the heck. :-)
>
Don't know what kind of information is 'pre
> Does this patch make the problem go away? If not, please send
> me the new kernel log message and a copy of the
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.o object file from the build.
Fixed the messages for me, thanks!
--
Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
David Miller writes:
> From: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:23:48 +0200
>
> > Both gcc-4.2.0 and gcc-4.1.2 compile compat_ptr(u32) as a nop,
> > so it seems that something earlier in the call chain must have
> > left a sign-extended value in the argument re
Hi David,
A few days ago, I sent an e-mail to you personally about the ESP driver.
I now have a more complete bug-report for the old driver.
The old driver now runs on my old sparcstation 4, the workaround was to
disable SCSI-multilun.
Strange thing is, 2.4.x also recognizes the ESP-SCSI-part o
David Miller writes:
> From: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:23:07 +0200 (MEST)
>
> > The 2.6.21-rc5 kernel compiled with gcc-4.2.0 20070316 boots ok
> > but is thrown into an infinite loop by `hdparm -Tt /dev/hda'.
> > Sysrq-P tells me that the call chain in
From: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:23:48 +0200
> Both gcc-4.2.0 and gcc-4.1.2 compile compat_ptr(u32) as a nop,
> so it seems that something earlier in the call chain must have
> left a sign-extended value in the argument register for `third'.
> And true enough,
18 matches
Mail list logo
