From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:12:26 -0600
> Does sparc have the concept of a phys_addr_t? We are in the process
> of expanding the lmb support to deal with 36-bit physical addresses on
> 32-bit machines.
On sparc64, where I intend to use this, unsigned long's
On Feb 13, 2008, at 2:41 AM, David Miller wrote:
As I mentioned to a few ppc folks at LCA08 I plan to use
the LMB code from powerpc as a basis for NUMA support on
sparc64.
There are two changes.
1) Move arch/powerpc/mm/lmb.c to lib/lmb.c, put the main
interface bits in include/linux/lmb.h,
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 00:41 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> As I mentioned to a few ppc folks at LCA08 I plan to use
> the LMB code from powerpc as a basis for NUMA support on
> sparc64.
>
> There are two changes.
>
> 1) Move arch/powerpc/mm/lmb.c to lib/lmb.c, put the main
>interface bits in in
From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:57:35 +0100
> Review had been easier if the patch was inlined.
Sorry :)
> Can we plase have this changed to use:
>
> config SPARC64
> + select HAVE_LMB
>
> And then in lib/Kconfig have
> +config HAVE_LMB
> + bool
>
> So
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:41:20AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> As I mentioned to a few ppc folks at LCA08 I plan to use
> the LMB code from powerpc as a basis for NUMA support on
> sparc64.
>
> There are two changes.
>
> 1) Move arch/powerpc/mm/lmb.c to lib/lmb.c, put the main
>interface
As I mentioned to a few ppc folks at LCA08 I plan to use
the LMB code from powerpc as a basis for NUMA support on
sparc64.
There are two changes.
1) Move arch/powerpc/mm/lmb.c to lib/lmb.c, put the main
interface bits in include/linux/lmb.h, put arch-specific
bits in asm/lmb.h and add Kcon
