Re: [PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-06-12 Thread Tom \"spot\" Callaway
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:56 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:12:58 -0500 > > > So, while I certainly don't disagree with your findings, this is not > > the resolution to the problem. > > Thanks for double checking everythin

Re: [PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-05-24 Thread David Miller
From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:12:58 -0500 > So, while I certainly don't disagree with your findings, this is not > the resolution to the problem. Thanks for double checking everything Tom. I'm going to put this patch on the back burner for now until

Re: [PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-05-24 Thread Tom \"spot\" Callaway
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 00:35 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:56:59 -0500 > > > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:27 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > > From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:04

Re: [PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-05-24 Thread David Miller
From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:56:59 -0500 > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:27 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:04:02 -0500 > > > > > Just for kicks, I tried passing esp_bus_reset_

Re: [PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-05-23 Thread David Miller
From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:56:59 -0500 > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:27 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:04:02 -0500 > > > > > Just for kicks, I tried passing esp_bus_reset_

Re: [PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-05-23 Thread Tom \"spot\" Callaway
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:15 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:04:02 -0500 > > > Just for kicks, I tried passing esp_bus_reset_settle=10, but it doesn't > > change the result at all. > > > > I also grabbed a log with esp_debu

Re: [PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-05-23 Thread Tom \"spot\" Callaway
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:27 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:04:02 -0500 > > > Just for kicks, I tried passing esp_bus_reset_settle=10, but it doesn't > > change the result at all. > > > > I also grabbed a log with esp_debu

Re: [PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-05-23 Thread David Miller
From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:04:02 -0500 > Just for kicks, I tried passing esp_bus_reset_settle=10, but it doesn't > change the result at all. > > I also grabbed a log with esp_debug=2047, that log is attached. Does this fix the problem? diff --git

Re: [PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-05-23 Thread David Miller
From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:04:02 -0500 > Just for kicks, I tried passing esp_bus_reset_settle=10, but it doesn't > change the result at all. > > I also grabbed a log with esp_debug=2047, that log is attached. A serial driver change breaking SCSI i

Re: [PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-05-23 Thread Tom \"spot\" Callaway
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 13:30 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 14:03 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > If folks could test out the following and report any > > regressions, especially on sparc32, I'd really appreciate > > it. I intend to push this to Linus and -stable after it

Re: [PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-05-23 Thread Tom \"spot\" Callaway
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 14:03 -0700, David Miller wrote: > If folks could test out the following and report any > regressions, especially on sparc32, I'd really appreciate > it. I intend to push this to Linus and -stable after it > gets some exposure. Well... I finally got around to testing this on

[PATCH]: Better serial console identification

2007-05-20 Thread David Miller
If folks could test out the following and report any regressions, especially on sparc32, I'd really appreciate it. I intend to push this to Linus and -stable after it gets some exposure. Bonus points for patches that fix the bugs you find :-) >From 8d8c99ec025445774ab663f13b7f9d537f8bf52e Mon S