Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-06-18 Thread Alon Levy
On 06/17/2014 04:08 PM, David Mansfield wrote: > > On 06/17/2014 03:24 AM, Alon Levy wrote: >> On 06/16/2014 04:16 PM, David Mansfield wrote: >>> On 06/09/2014 09:29 AM, Alon Levy wrote: On 06/09/2014 04:18 PM, David Mansfield wrote: > On 06/09/2014 07:18 AM, Alon Levy wrote: >> On 06

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-06-17 Thread David Mansfield
On 06/17/2014 03:24 AM, Alon Levy wrote: On 06/16/2014 04:16 PM, David Mansfield wrote: On 06/09/2014 09:29 AM, Alon Levy wrote: On 06/09/2014 04:18 PM, David Mansfield wrote: On 06/09/2014 07:18 AM, Alon Levy wrote: On 06/03/2014 04:14 PM, David Mansfield wrote: Bump. I'll make it easy. T

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-06-17 Thread Alon Levy
On 06/16/2014 04:16 PM, David Mansfield wrote: > > On 06/09/2014 09:29 AM, Alon Levy wrote: >> On 06/09/2014 04:18 PM, David Mansfield wrote: >>> On 06/09/2014 07:18 AM, Alon Levy wrote: On 06/03/2014 04:14 PM, David Mansfield wrote: > Bump. I'll make it easy. This is a multiple choice r

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-06-16 Thread David Mansfield
On 06/09/2014 09:29 AM, Alon Levy wrote: On 06/09/2014 04:18 PM, David Mansfield wrote: On 06/09/2014 07:18 AM, Alon Levy wrote: On 06/03/2014 04:14 PM, David Mansfield wrote: Bump. I'll make it easy. This is a multiple choice response form. Anyone reading this can respond with one letter so

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-06-09 Thread David Mansfield
On 06/09/2014 09:29 AM, Alon Levy wrote: On 06/09/2014 04:18 PM, David Mansfield wrote: On 06/09/2014 07:18 AM, Alon Levy wrote: On 06/03/2014 04:14 PM, David Mansfield wrote: Bump. I'll make it easy. This is a multiple choice response form. Anyone reading this can respond with one letter so

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-06-09 Thread Alon Levy
On 06/09/2014 04:18 PM, David Mansfield wrote: > > On 06/09/2014 07:18 AM, Alon Levy wrote: >> On 06/03/2014 04:14 PM, David Mansfield wrote: >>> Bump. I'll make it easy. This is a multiple choice response form. >>> Anyone reading this can respond with one letter so save time and effort. >>> >>>

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-06-09 Thread David Mansfield
On 06/09/2014 07:18 AM, Alon Levy wrote: On 06/03/2014 04:14 PM, David Mansfield wrote: Bump. I'll make it easy. This is a multiple choice response form. Anyone reading this can respond with one letter so save time and effort. a) "We're too busy with RHEL 7/paying clients, come back in a mont

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-06-09 Thread Alon Levy
On 06/03/2014 04:14 PM, David Mansfield wrote: > Bump. I'll make it easy. This is a multiple choice response form. > Anyone reading this can respond with one letter so save time and effort. > > a) "We're too busy with RHEL 7/paying clients, come back in a month/some > timeframe" > b) "There's an

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-06-03 Thread Marc-André Lureau
- Original Message - > Bump. I'll make it easy. This is a multiple choice response form. > Anyone reading this can respond with one letter so save time and effort. > > a) "We're too busy with RHEL 7/paying clients, come back in a month/some > timeframe" > b) "There's an SEP field on the

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-06-03 Thread David Mansfield
Bump. I'll make it easy. This is a multiple choice response form. Anyone reading this can respond with one letter so save time and effort. a) "We're too busy with RHEL 7/paying clients, come back in a month/some timeframe" b) "There's an SEP field on these problems, everyone who understands t

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-05-27 Thread David Mansfield
On 05/19/2014 10:01 AM, David Mansfield wrote: This patch series addresses two critical bugs that prevent dual-head from working in a linux-linux environment. (All testing done on F20 fully updated as guest, host and client). We (myself and a colleague) have been using patched versions of qxl.k

[Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

2014-05-19 Thread David Mansfield
This patch series addresses two critical bugs that prevent dual-head from working in a linux-linux environment. (All testing done on F20 fully updated as guest, host and client). We (myself and a colleague) have been using patched versions of qxl.ko and xorg-qxl for a week or so and these patc