The standard says yes, but my question concerned a system where the
area below the obstruction was not used for storage.
At 04:41 PM 7/16/2007, you wrote:
There was an earlier post about placing sprinklers under obstructions when
the overhead system is ESFR, are these required to be ESFR as we
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Hewitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:48 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: ESFR above and below?
Yes, obstructions to ESFR heads are typically protected by additional
ESFR
heads.
The FM Data Sheets, however, outline
Jeff
Have you checked the updated FM datasheet 2-2? In most cases you do not need
additional heads any more.
Cheers
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Hewitt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07/17/2007 04:51 AM
To:
Subject: Re: ESFR above and below?
THIS MESSAGE ORIGINA
rized. If you
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately at the
above captioned address.
- Original Message -
From: "Bobby Gillett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 3:41 PM
Subject: ESFR above and below?
There was
]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 3:41 PM
Subject: ESFR above and below?
There was an earlier post about placing sprinklers under obstructions when
the overhead system is ESFR, are these required to be ESFR as well? I
didn't
see any replies in the archives. How about it?
Bobby Gil
There was an earlier post about placing sprinklers under obstructions when
the overhead system is ESFR, are these required to be ESFR as well? I didn't
see any replies in the archives. How about it?
Bobby Gillett
Project Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(731)-424-0130
___
