On Oct 21, 2007, at 7:20 PM, iain duncan wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-21-10 at 17:12 -0400, Michael Bayer wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Paul Johnston wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
Resource.select_by( foo="bar" )
>>> Untested, but I reckon this will work:
>>>
>>> Resource.query.
On Sun, 2007-21-10 at 17:12 -0400, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
> On Oct 21, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Paul Johnston wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Resource.select_by( foo="bar" )
> >>
> >>
> > Untested, but I reckon this will work:
> >
> > Resource.query.filter(Resource.foo.op('rlike')('bar'))
> >
>
> might
On Oct 21, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Paul Johnston wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Resource.select_by( foo="bar" )
>>
>>
> Untested, but I reckon this will work:
>
> Resource.query.filter(Resource.foo.op('rlike')('bar'))
>
might need to call op() off the Table instance for now, might not
have added op() to the c
Hi,
>Resource.select_by( foo="bar" )
>
>
Untested, but I reckon this will work:
Resource.query.filter(Resource.foo.op('rlike')('bar'))
Paul
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 16:41 -0700, jason kirtland wrote:
> Jim Musil wrote:
> > I don't see support for RLIKE, NOT RLIKE, or REGEXP anywhere.
> >
> > Is there support for this?
>
> Yes, you can use these operators and any others via the .op() method:
>
>table.c.col1.op('rlike')('re')
>n
On Fri, 2007-19-10 at 17:06 -0700, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Daniel Haus wrote:
> > Looks like you're frighteningly successful. You're right, python could
> > use much more love, but look at this! Obviously the poll is not
> > representative anymore, is it...
>
> Yeah - a little skewed there.
>
> On
