i use flask connect to postgres
def post_insert(username):
conn = engine.connect()
encoded = base64.b64encode(username.encode('utf-8'))
puresql = sqla.text("INSERT INTO friends(name) VALUES(:encoded)")
conn.execute(puresql,encoded = encoded)
i insert username encode with base64 t
Working on this level of integration is way over my head, but I'd love to
see this happen and wanted to quickly +1.
I just had to refactor some code to store User Submitted Media into
Postgres for background processing. While doing a bit of research, I
learned that the streaming functionality
how are you running them?
it isn't reporting any "failure", this seems like it's finding a bad
test case. do you have any test.py type stuff it might be hitting?
On 7/8/14, 5:56 PM, Jason Newton wrote:
> Any thoughts on why the unit testing is failing?
>
> platform linux2 -- Python 2.7.6 -- p
Any thoughts on why the unit testing is failing?
platform linux2 -- Python 2.7.6 -- py-1.4.20 -- pytest-2.5.2 --
/usr/bin/python
== 5776 passed, 688
skipped in 139.77 seconds
===
you can make a new Session() with expire_on_commit=False, that can be
from your sessionmaker. the settings you apply there override whats in
the original factory.
Though for status logging I tend to just use a separate
Session/transaction for that, that way the main transaction can maintain
atomi
I have a situation where I need to issue a `commit()` without expiring the
object/attributes from the session. I'm in a `Celery` task, and need to
log progress at certain points into a "status" column. the status points
will be used to troubleshoot and "fix" jobs that didn't correctly complet
Check out the docs for the `Association Proxy`
- http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_9/orm/extensions/associationproxy.html
With that extension, you might be able to do everything within a
relationship.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy"
Am 08.07.2014 18:51, schrieb Jonathan Rogers:
> On 07/08/2014 12:39 PM, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I am wondering how the following would be translated to sqlalchemy.
>>
>> I have three tables:
>>
>> "ClientMachine"
>> "MachineToken"
>> "Token"
>>
>> The table MachineTo
Hmmm, must be a problem elsewhere. Sorry for wasting your time, Mike, but
thanks for the test case. Donation enroute.
On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 12:02:52 PM UTC-4, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
> a test case is attached, show me the failure please, thanks.
>
>
>
> On 7/8/14, 10:59 AM, Brian Findlay wrot
On 07/08/2014 12:39 PM, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am wondering how the following would be translated to sqlalchemy.
>
> I have three tables:
>
> "ClientMachine"
> "MachineToken"
> "Token"
>
> The table MachineToken acts as n:m mapping between "ClientMachine" and
> "T
Hi there,
I am wondering how the following would be translated to sqlalchemy.
I have three tables:
"ClientMachine"
"MachineToken"
"Token"
The table MachineToken acts as n:m mapping between "ClientMachine" and
"Token".
Each machine can have several tokens assigned.
Looks like this:
a test case is attached, show me the failure please, thanks.
On 7/8/14, 10:59 AM, Brian Findlay wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I'm using your variant on the 'unique object' recipe (see previous
> posting http://goo.gl/I1buRz) with some composite association proxies.
> Recently, the data I've been working
Hi Mike,
I'm using your variant on the 'unique object' recipe (see previous
posting http://goo.gl/I1buRz) with some composite association proxies.
Recently, the data I've been working with introduced a duplicate in the
property I've been using with attribute_mapped_collection(), so I'm trying
13 matches
Mail list logo
