with String properties?
>
> > On Jun 28, 2:20 pm,limscoder wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> >> Is there a way to automatically get an interned string for objects
> >> with String
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are su
What I meant to say was:
Is there a way to automatically get interned strings when querying
objects with String properties?
On Jun 28, 2:20 pm, limscoder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to automatically get an interned string for objects
>
Hi,
Is there a way to automatically get an interned string for objects
with String
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
Thanks.
I was trying to map both classes to the same table, and that was
causing problems!
On Apr 10, 1:43 pm, "Michael Bayer" wrote:
> limscoderwrote:
>
> > In 5.2 I was able to map a base-class, and sub-classes would
> > automatically be persisted as the base type. In 5.3 I get an
> > Unmappe
In 5.2 I was able to map a base-class, and sub-classes would
automatically be persisted as the base type. In 5.3 I get an
UnmappedInstanceError when trying to persist an object of the sub-
class type. I didn't see anything about this change in the changelog.
Is there a way to get the <5.3 behavior
