On Jan 24, 2008, at 5:55 AM, maxi wrote:
>
> One more thing,
> I remove the many to many mapper (for ConvPre class and the associated
> mapper) and:
> - This work fine on sa 0.4.x
> - This don't work on sa 0.3.10
>
> Are there any changes relative a this problem in 0.4.x versions ?
its the sam
One more thing,
I remove the many to many mapper (for ConvPre class and the associated
mapper) and:
- This work fine on sa 0.4.x
- This don't work on sa 0.3.10
Are there any changes relative a this problem in 0.4.x versions ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received th
On Oct 1, 2007, at 9:22 PM, Dan Eloff wrote:
>
> On 10/1/07, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> most likely too many association rows are present in the m2m table.
>>
>
> Do you mean there were redundant associations? How can I check if
> that's the cause of the problem?
>
the stack
On 10/1/07, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> most likely too many association rows are present in the m2m table.
>
Do you mean there were redundant associations? How can I check if
that's the cause of the problem?
Thanks,
-Dan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Yo
Also, I think we're going to change the name of that exception. its
not necessarily "Concurrent" modification...Hibernate calls it
"StaleStateException" which might be better.
On Oct 1, 2007, at 7:25 PM, Dan Eloff wrote:
>
> ConcurrentModificationError: Deleted rowcount 3 does not match num
On Oct 1, 2007, at 7:25 PM, Dan Eloff wrote:
>
> ConcurrentModificationError: Deleted rowcount 3 does not match number
> of objects deleted 1
>
> raised by this code:
>
> with Session() as session:
> dl = session.merge(dl)
> session.delete(dl)
>
> There are no oth
