On Dec 14, 2007, at 4:02 PM, dykang wrote:
>
> Sorry, I didn't clarify, I was speaking about with 0.3, not with 0.4.
0.3 has a very limited add_entity() method, with no ability to set it
against an arbitrary alias, so its impossible in 0.3 for an ORM Query
to load parallel instances where t
Sorry, I didn't clarify, I was speaking about with 0.3, not with 0.4.
On Dec 14, 11:25 am, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007, at 1:34 PM, dykang wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > This example can't work in this sequence, or this query can't be run
> > and mapped?
> > If I wanted to ex
On Dec 14, 2007, at 1:34 PM, dykang wrote:
>
> This example can't work in this sequence, or this query can't be run
> and mapped?
> If I wanted to execute this query:
> SELECT inner_query.test_id AS inner_query_test_id,
> inner_query.test_other_id AS inner_query_test_other_id,
> inner_query.test
This example can't work in this sequence, or this query can't be run
and mapped?
If I wanted to execute this query:
SELECT inner_query.test_id AS inner_query_test_id,
inner_query.test_other_id AS inner_query_test_other_id,
inner_query.test_active AS inner_query_test_active,
inner_query.test2_id AS
this example as is cant really work in any version because the query
doesnt know to map the "s2" alias to the mappers that its using, so
you have to explicitly connect them. 0.3 has more limited capability
to do this.
anyway in 0.4 you can do it like this:
print
session
.query
(Test
Hi, I was looking at this bug fix, and I couldn't figure out where
part 2 of the problem was actually fixed.
If you can ignore the absurdity of this example, it shows a situation
where the second problem still appears to
exist:
from sqlalchemy import *
from sqlalchemy.orm import *
metadata = Me
On Oct 17, 2007, at 4:07 AM, klaus wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot! The solution is so simple that I feel a little
> embarassed...
>
im embarrased that bug's been present for so long !
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Thanks a lot! The solution is so simple that I feel a little
embarassed...
On 16 Okt., 18:15, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2007, at 10:45 AM, klaus wrote:
>
>
>
> > The only thing that I could find out about the reason is that in
> > engine/base.py (1290)
> >context.c
On Oct 16, 2007, at 10:45 AM, klaus wrote:
>
> The only thing that I could find out about the reason is that in
> engine/base.py (1290)
>context.column_labels
> contains the wrong entries. It should contain something like
>{..., '_': '_', ...}.
> In the case above, however, it contains
>
