On Nov 12, 2007, at 5:07 AM, che wrote:
>
> i had similar need to order things prev week. I thought that may be in
> the future there will be possible to define some artificial dependency
> (similar to relation) that have no its counterpart in the database in
> order to meet similar requrements
Hi,
On 11 , 04:02, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
> > Isn't it possible to just use the order used by the programmer?
> > If I call
> > save(A)
> > save(B)
>
> the order of save() is signficant for instances of one class:
>
> sa
On Nov 10, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
> Isn't it possible to just use the order used by the programmer?
> If I call
> save(A)
> save(B)
>
the order of save() is signficant for instances of one class:
save(A1)
save(A2)
will insert A1 and A2 in that order.
but beyond that, the ord
Michael Bayer ha scritto:
>
> On Nov 9, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
>> Michael Bayer ha scritto:
>>> Sorry, I forgot to add that the mappers A and B must have a
>>> relation()
>>> specified in order for unit of work to determine the order of
>>> operations. this has always been
On Nov 9, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
> Michael Bayer ha scritto:
>> Sorry, I forgot to add that the mappers A and B must have a
>> relation()
>> specified in order for unit of work to determine the order of
>> operations. this has always been the case in all versions.
>> illust
Michael Bayer ha scritto:
> Sorry, I forgot to add that the mappers A and B must have a relation()
> specified in order for unit of work to determine the order of
> operations. this has always been the case in all versions.
> illustrated in the attached script.
>
But I have a piece a cod
Sorry, I forgot to add that the mappers A and B must have a relation()
specified in order for unit of work to determine the order of
operations. this has always been the case in all versions.
illustrated in the attached script.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You re
what do your Table objects look like ? a ForeignKey() object must be
present on the "y" column of "B" in order for the unit of work to know
the proper order of operations (or the mappers must have explicit
primaryjoin/foreign_keys parameters configured).
On Nov 9, 10:42 am, Manlio Perillo <[EMA
