* Michael Bayer [2014-02-12 09:19]:
> On Feb 12, 2014, at 1:49 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
> > I know that flush does not trigger expiry. ;) I was wondering whether
> > savepoints qualified as being a stronger boundary than flush and thus might
> > be worthy of triggering expiry. But I guess t
On 11 Feb 2014 06:54:22 Michael Bayer wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2014, at 3:44 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
> >parent = session.query(Parent).first()
> >self.assertEqual(1, len(parent.children))
> >session.begin_nested()
> >session.delete(parent.children[0])
> >
On 3 Feb 2014 09:51:20 Michael Bayer wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 2:39 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
> > I guess I didn't make it clear enough that I'm talking mainly about
> > this collections issue. Sorry about that; let me try again:
> > I feel it would be much more convenient if the state ach
* Michael Bayer wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
> > savepoint = session.begin_nested()
> > session.delete(stuff)
> > session.begin_nested()
> > # Now, if I don't call session.expire_all() here, stuff won't be perceived
> > as gone
> > perform_checks_while_p
