On Sep 1, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
>
>
> Hm. I think it belongs to SA, because that should be an agnostic
> function migrate (and other tools/libs) just can use.
>
> I don't mind writing it for the DB I've got access to (postgres) -
> however, if you don't see any chance for inc
Michael Bayer schrieb:
> not within SQLA, though you can propose this feature for sqlalchemy-
> migrate.
>
> "schemas" are a slippery topic among databases (such as on oracle, the
> "schema" is really the user who "owns" the tables,
This is not entirely correct. Every user in oracle has a sch
not within SQLA, though you can propose this feature for sqlalchemy-
migrate.
"schemas" are a slippery topic among databases (such as on oracle, the
"schema" is really the user who "owns" the tables, on sqlite its
unclear if a "schema" is a separate file, or what, etc.) so SQLA
doesn't get
