[sqlalchemy] Re: r3695 causes strange error

2007-11-07 Thread Michael Bayer
On Nov 7, 2007, at 2:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - something changed in the traversing (AbstractClauseProcessor - > r3727) > and it does not find proper things... ACP has been entirely rewritten. if you can provide simple tests in the form that theyre present in test/sql/generative.

[sqlalchemy] Re: r3695 causes strange error

2007-11-06 Thread sdobrev
Michael Bayer wrote: > nevermind, this one was pretty straightforward and r3695 didnt > actually "break" things, it just revealed the lack of checking for > things elsewhere, so works in r3747. > yes, that works. but now multiple other things broke. pf - the mapper.properties in its n

[sqlalchemy] Re: r3695 causes strange error

2007-11-06 Thread Michael Bayer
nevermind, this one was pretty straightforward and r3695 didnt actually "break" things, it just revealed the lack of checking for things elsewhere, so works in r3747. On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> sorry, here the files >> > and the line

[sqlalchemy] Re: r3695 causes strange error

2007-11-06 Thread Michael Bayer
ugh can you attach a zipfile please, they came out inline On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > sorry, here the files > >> hi. >> i have somewhat messy setup (~test case), about association with >> intermediate table/class, double pointing to one side and single >> pointing to

[sqlalchemy] Re: r3695 causes strange error

2007-11-06 Thread sdobrev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > sorry, here the files > and the line 83 ( marked XXX ) there must be =None to get the error. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, se

[sqlalchemy] Re: r3695 causes strange error

2007-11-06 Thread sdobrev
sorry, here the files > hi. > i have somewhat messy setup (~test case), about association with > intermediate table/class, double pointing to one side and single > pointing to another. i do set up both A-links in one item; and set up > only first in another item, the other link (a2_link) is pre