[sqlalchemy] Re: relation with same class/table on both sides

2008-07-09 Thread Tom Hogarty
The manager and direct reports example was just what my project needed. I'm looking forward to upgrading to 0.5 in the future so that I don't have to enter redundant primaryjoin and secondaryjoin on the backref. Thank you Mike! On Jun 28, 1:10 am, Tom Hogarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow, th

[sqlalchemy] Re: relation with same class/table on both sides

2008-06-27 Thread Tom Hogarty
Wow, thank you very much for the detailed example. It looks like just what I need. I look forward to trying it out very soon. -Tom On Jun 27, 6:12 pm, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this relation will require you to configure primaryjoin and   > secondaryjoin (it should be raising an

[sqlalchemy] Re: relation with same class/table on both sides

2008-06-27 Thread Michael Bayer
this relation will require you to configure primaryjoin and secondaryjoin (it should be raising an error without them). an example is attached. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group.