>> Subject: Re: [sqlalchemy] Two Objects, One Table and the inverse
>>
>>
>> On Apr 5, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca wrote:
>>
>>
>>Thks for the insight Michael.
>>
>>With the @property solution, its not possible to
> -Original Message-
> From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com [mailto:sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Michael Bayer
> Sent: 05 April 2011 18:38
> To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [sqlalchemy] Two Objects, One Table and the inverse
>
>
>
On Apr 5, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca wrote:
> Thks for the insight Michael.
>
> With the @property solution, its not possible to make queries like
> session.query(Person).filter(Person.address.street="Something") right?
that's not possible with standard SQLAlchemy expressi
Thks for the insight Michael.
With the @property solution, its not possible to make queries like
session.query(Person).filter(Person.address.street="Something") right?
Cascade Saving/Updating in that instance should be a problem too. I tested
the composite solution, it's nice but the queries get a
On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to break a table in two Python objects? Ex:
>
> Python objects:
>
> class Person:
>
> name = Column(String)
>
> class Address:
>
> street = Column(String)
> city = Column(String)
>
>
> Tab
Hi,
Is it possible to break a table in two Python objects? Ex:
Python objects:
class Person:
name = Column(String)
class Address:
street = Column(String)
city = Column(String)
Table:
table Person
name varchar
city varchar
street varchar
How can i make the "connecti
