Re: [sqlalchemy] using SQLA in distributed, concurrent, or asynchronous contexts?

2013-10-03 Thread Claudio Freire
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Michael Bayer wrote: > > well there's always gevent. It might even be possible to get twisted and > gevent to work together. > > So far I've managed to stick with multiprocessing for any kind of > parallelism and it's done fine, but I'm not scaling up to hundreds o

Re: [sqlalchemy] using SQLA in distributed, concurrent, or asynchronous contexts?

2013-10-03 Thread Michael Bayer
well there's always gevent. It might even be possible to get twisted and gevent to work together. So far I've managed to stick with multiprocessing for any kind of parallelism and it's done fine, but I'm not scaling up to hundreds or thousands of simultaneous things going on. On Oct 3, 201

[sqlalchemy] using SQLA in distributed, concurrent, or asynchronous contexts?

2013-10-03 Thread Iain Duncan
Hi folks, I just got a new position and am hoping I can advocate for using SQLAlchemy there. I will be doing some backend web service stuff that interacts with a db, but likely in some form of distributed architecture. It's all going to be on AWS. I believe there will be some service implementation