Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] ProxyEngine refactored

2006-03-03 Thread Jonathan Ellis
On 3/3/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2/25/06, Jeff Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Finally, if Kevin "Dangerous" Dangoor permits, I'll commit basic support for> SQLAlchemy to the TurboGears framework. This will allow you to declare a > PackageEngine (think AutoConnectEngine th

Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] ProxyEngine refactored

2006-03-03 Thread Kevin Dangoor
On 2/25/06, Jeff Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Finally, if Kevin "Dangerous" Dangoor permits, I'll commit basic support for > SQLAlchemy to the TurboGears framework. This will allow you to declare a > PackageEngine (think AutoConnectEngine that pulls it's dburi from a CherryPy > config file)

Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] ProxyEngine refactored

2006-02-25 Thread Michael Bayer
hey Jeff - great job, I am excited as well. You might have noticed the proxyengine already got simpler due to the refactorings I did yesterday, and I also would like to abstract away the whole "oid column" thing some more so its not so intrusive. Also looking forward to seeing some more activit

[Sqlalchemy-users] ProxyEngine refactored

2006-02-25 Thread Jeff Watkins
In order to support frameworks like TurboGears, I've refactored the ProxyEngine class into BaseProxyEngine and ProxyEngine. The BaseProxyEngine merely provides all the proxying logic, while ProxyEngine provides the thread-local storage aspect needed for WSGI.In addition, I added an AutoConnectEngin