On May 10, 2006, at 2:17 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
But I'm also concerned that it requires the structures contain a
lot more functionality, because they have to be able to portably
express fairly high-level ideas. Off the top of my head, the
difference between a database that uses sequences an
Michael Bayer wrote:
On May 10, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
I've actually been wondering if a further division would be better.
Instead of defining objects with particular functionality, focus on
simpler protocols (aka magic methods), separately providing
implementations of that.
On May 10, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
I've actually been wondering if a further division would be better.
Instead of defining objects with particular functionality, focus on
simpler protocols (aka magic methods), separately providing
implementations of that. The model that SQLAl
3 matches
Mail list logo
