Hello.
Please, make test 'test/backup2.test' more compatible with FreeBSD.
This is patch for it:
--- test/backup2.test.orig 2017-07-07 04:59:34 UTC
+++ test/backup2.test
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ do_test backup2-9 {
#
if {$tcl_platform(platform)=="windows"} {
set msg {cannot open source databa
select wonkys, fubars, sets, constants, comments, logs, whipitys, doodas
from (select sum(wonkies == 'WNK') as wonkys,
sum(fubars == 'FBR') as fubars
from table_to_summarize
) as S1,
(select sum(code_type == 'SET') as sets,
sum(code_type == '
That is the one and only whole statement, and I see no references to anything
else in the initial query.
So, delete
with
kcounts(t, c) as (
select code_type, count(*)
from keys
group by code_type
),
...
select ...,
(select c from kcounts where t = 'SET') as "#sets",
(sele
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Dominique Devienne
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
>>
>> select sum(code_type == 'SET') as "#sets",
>>sum(code_type == 'CST') as "#constants",
>>sum(code_type == 'CMT') as #comments",
>>sum(code_type == 'LOG'
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> select sum(code_type == 'SET') as "#sets",
>sum(code_type == 'CST') as "#constants",
>sum(code_type == 'CMT') as #comments",
>sum(code_type == 'LOG') as "#logs"
> from keys;
>
> will do a single table scan and retu
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > It's a group-by query, so despite using the index, all rowids for the
> only
> > 4 different "index entries" must still be counted,
> > and that's still definitely longer to do that than full scanning the
> tab
select sum(code_type == 'SET') as "#sets",
sum(code_type == 'CST') as "#constants",
sum(code_type == 'CMT') as #comments",
sum(code_type == 'LOG') as "#logs"
from keys;
will do a single table scan and return the sums in a single statement with no
complications ...
--
˙uʍ
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> >> You could put kcounts into a temporary table.
> >
> > I could it in a table, but then who updates kcounts when keys (or
> keys_tab)
> > changes?
>
>
Dominique Devienne wrote:
> It's a group-by query, so despite using the index, all rowids for the only
> 4 different "index entries" must still be counted,
> and that's still definitely longer to do that than full scanning the table
> once.
So why using GROUP BY? The top-level query does not real
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
> On 6 Jul 2017, at 12:32pm, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > Actually not that much apparently.
> > No Simon, I didn't have an index on code_type.
> > In fact keys is itself a view, and cote_type a case expression.
>
> The index you created is no
Dominique Devienne wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>> You could put kcounts into a temporary table.
>
> I could it in a table, but then who updates kcounts when keys (or keys_tab)
> changes?
I did not say "table" but "temporary table":
BEGIN;
CREATE TEMPORARY TABL
This is actually answered on the system.data.sqlite download page.
https://system.data.sqlite.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/downloads.wiki
Scroll down to the section, "Using Native Library Pre-Loading".
For some reason (?) on Chrome the text is about 30pt, so you shouldn't be
able to miss it.
Essen
Could your 32 bit app be picking up a 64 bit dll. Could you rename the
dll's and hard code the location into your library?
May not work for your release code but may help you narrow down the issue.
Paul
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 at 18:19, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
>
> On 5 Jul 2017, at 1:41pm, Gregor Pa
On 6 Jul 2017, at 12:32pm, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> Actually not that much apparently.
> No Simon, I didn't have an index on code_type.
> In fact keys is itself a view, and cote_type a case expression.
The index you created is not helpful. It is not useful for what you’re doing.
I suggest
On 7/6/17, Manoj Sengottuvel wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> if I do the Vacuum database before the encryption(SEE) then I didn't have
> any issue like "The database disk image is malformed".
>
> Should I do the vacuum every time before applying the encryption/
> decryption (SEE) ?
>
Running VACUUM sho
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > with
> > kcounts(t, c) as (
> > select code_type, count(*)
> >from keys
> > group by code_type
> > ),
> > ...
> > select ...,
> >(select c from kcounts where t = 'SET') as "#sets",
> >(
On 06/07/2017 08:08, Ashif Ahamed wrote:
When there is some data bringing looping scenario :
*INSERT INTO FOLDER VALUES(2, 'Loop Data', 5);*
After inserting this loop data , when i trigger the above recursive query
in SQLite it keeps on running without bringing any results.
Note: In oracle
Ashif Ahamed wrote:
> I 'm trying to achieve , oracle's hierarchical CONNECT BY NOCYCLE PRIOR in
> SQLite database hierarchical queries i.e. with clause queries(common table
> expression)
>
> When there is a loop in the data ,with clause queries in SQLite database is
> running for long with infinit
bdoom wrote:
> https://pastebin.com/muEvCTz2
> sqlite3.c(16979,5): warning : 'SQLITE_4_BYTE_ALIGNED_MALLOC' is not defined,
> evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
> 2>#if SQLITE_4_BYTE_ALIGNED_MALLOC
> 2>^
> Is this anything to worry about?
No. The C standard says that in the #if expression, identifie
Dominique Devienne wrote:
> with
> kcounts(t, c) as (
> select code_type, count(*)
>from keys
> group by code_type
> ),
> ...
> select ...,
>(select c from kcounts where t = 'SET') as "#sets",
>(select c from kcounts where t = 'CST') as "#constants",
>(select c from
On 6 Jul 2017, at 9:52am, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> With all 4 counts, the views takes ~ 6.5s to compute its 1 row
Just checking ….
Do you have an index on keys(code_type) ?
Would it not be possible to express this VIEW without the "WITH" construction ?
For instance if there is a "SETS"
On 06/07/2017 17:01, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
I already did this before but it was not accepted.
For myself I did a modification on sqlite3 to allow the use of "AS" on
delete/update statements.
You can see the parser part here
https://github.com/mingodad/sqlite/blob/decimal64/src/parse
On 06/07/2017 16:04, Paul Sanderson wrote:
The SQLite syntax diagrams are my first point of call when looking at an
error in my code like this.
https://sqlite.org/lang_update.html
"AS" and an alias are clearly not part of the statement.
And that is how (with testing) I eventually worked out
On 06/07/2017 16:33, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
John McMahon wrote:
an alias for an "UPDATE" table name is not permitted. Is there a particular
reason for this?
The UPDATE statement affects a single table. While an alias might be
a convenience, it is not necessary (any naming conflicts in subq
> Aha, I wasn't certain we were allowed to mark it public yet. I don't want
> to upset anyone needlessly, but it would be easier to discuss the bug in
> public.
I've just turned
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sqlite3/+bug/1700937 public
> (Especially since it appears to be 'just' out-o
On 06/07/2017 15:03, Keith Medcalf wrote:
Do you know of any implementation of SQL that accepts an AS clause for the
updated table? I don't think any do.
No Keith, I don't. My only exposure to SQL is sqlite.
Some versions have a FROM extension and you CAN specify an alias for the update
I 'm trying to achieve , oracle's hierarchical CONNECT BY NOCYCLE PRIOR in
SQLite database hierarchical queries i.e. with clause queries(common table
expression)
When there is a loop in the data ,with clause queries in SQLite database is
running for long with infinite loops
Consider the below sam
[Sorry for the late reply, but I enjoyed a nice long weekend except
for the sunburns. I kept the wider Cc:s since it feels like this can
be opened.]
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 12:52:54PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote:
> Seth, I can turn the Launchpad bug report as public if you wish. I
> marked it privat
https://pastebin.com/muEvCTz2
Is this anything to worry about? It's a massive list of warnings. That isn't
even all of them. However, they are all for #define macros which seem to not
be found anywhere. I even downloaded a copy from sqlite.org of SQLite.c and
could not find those macros in the fil
On 06/07/2017 17:01, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
I already did this before but it was not accepted.
For myself I did a modification on sqlite3 to allow the use of "AS" on
delete/update statements.
You can see the parser part here
https://github.com/mingodad/sqlite/blob/decimal64/src/parse
On 06/07/2017 16:33, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
John McMahon wrote:
an alias for an "UPDATE" table name is not permitted. Is there a particular
reason for this?
The UPDATE statement affects a single table. While an alias might be
a convenience, it is not necessary (any naming conflicts in subq
On 06/07/2017 16:04, Paul Sanderson wrote:
The SQLite syntax diagrams are my first point of call when looking at an
error in my code like this.
https://sqlite.org/lang_update.html
"AS" and an alias are clearly not part of the statement.
And that is how (with testing) I eventually worked out
On 06/07/2017 15:03, Keith Medcalf wrote:
Do you know of any implementation of SQL that accepts an AS clause for the
updated table? I don't think any do.
No Keith, I don't. My only exposure to SQL is sqlite.
Some versions have a FROM extension and you CAN specify an alias for the update
I have a view gathering statistics from 3 different tables, one of which is
largish (~ 2M rows).
The view is similar to this:
with
kcounts(t, c) as (
select code_type, count(*)
from keys
group by code_type
),
...
select ...,
(select c from kcounts where t = 'SET') as "#sets",
Hi Richard,
if I do the Vacuum database before the encryption(SEE) then I didn't have
any issue like "The database disk image is malformed".
Should I do the vacuum every time before applying the encryption/
decryption (SEE) ?
Let me know How to restore the malformed database?
Regards,
Manoj
I already did this before but it was not accepted.
For myself I did a modification on sqlite3 to allow the use of "AS" on
delete/update statements.
You can see the parser part here
https://github.com/mingodad/sqlite/blob/decimal64/src/parse.y .
Cheers !
On 06/07/17 05:16, John McMahon wro
36 matches
Mail list logo
