On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 10:16:47AM -0700, Will Leshner wrote:
> But if NULL is distinct for UNIQUE columns, isn't that the result you
> would expect?
I took it to mean NULL is distinct from any other value, not that each NULL
is distinct from any other NULL.
Why would one want NULL to behave thi
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:23:58PM -0500, Jay Sprenkle wrote:
> You might try adding NOT NULL to your column constraints and
> a default to an empty string in the create table.
> I thought UNIQUE implied NOT NULL but I might be
> wrong.
The null handling page
http://sqlite.org/nulls.html
says t
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:19:04PM -0700, Mario Gutierrez wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> This would not work as I could define a table like this
>
> CRETE TABLE my_table (
> id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
> ...
> )
>
> This would meet your criteria, but 'id' is not an autoincremented column.
OK,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:24:58PM -0700, David M. Cook wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:19:04PM -0700, Mario Gutierrez wrote:
>
> > CRETE TABLE my_table (
> > id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
> > ...
> > )
> >
> > This would meet your criteria, but 'i
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:19:04PM -0700, Mario Gutierrez wrote:
> CRETE TABLE my_table (
> id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
> ...
> )
>
> This would meet your criteria, but 'id' is not an autoincremented column.
Sorry, I don't get it. Why is it not? Also, why would one do that? If I
wanted an non-a
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 05:38:28PM -0700, Mario Gutierrez wrote:
> I'm writing a SQLite adapter for a code generation tool. I'm a little
> stumped on how you query SQLite to determine if a column is
> autoincremented. I've tried
An auto-increment column is defined as INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, so loo
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:55:07AM -0400, Mark Wyszomierski wrote:
> Does sqlite allow multiple keys? When I created a table I did:
> CREATE TABLE test (name, address, fav_color, primary key(name, address))
I usually use UNIQUE, though, for "business keys", and reserve PRIMARY KEY
for the auto
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:54:26AM +0530, Ajay wrote:
> There are 3 tables interconnected with each other by foreign keys. On
> deleting particular item from one table should delete all items from other
> tables that was pointing to it using foreign key (Just like
> ON_DELETE_CASCADE - SQLite does
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:20:14AM -0700, David M. Cook wrote:
> CREATE VIEW flat_recording_view as select r.recording_id, c.composer_name,
> SQL error: no such column: composer_name
>
> Aliasing the column names in the view using the 'as' syntax didn't help.
I have a view
CREATE VIEW flat_recording_view as select r.recording_id, c.composer_name,
w.title, r.description, l.label_name, d.catalog_no from composer c join work
w on (c.composer_id=w.composer_id) join recording r on (w.work_id=r.work_id)
join disc d on (r.disc_id=d.disc_id) join label l on (l
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 10:41:50AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Has anyone been successful using an object relational mapping tool with
> Sqlite? I'm looking for such a tool that has a non-commercial free
> license.
For Python: http://www.sqlobject.org
If you're using Java, I'd consider hi
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:53:05AM +0200, Stefan Neumann wrote:
> me smiling brightly, when thinking on the things I could do porting this
> to the mozilla-platform.
The mozilla SQL stuff is here:
http://eu.mozdev.org/Brussels2003/talks/jan/index.html
I thought of just using the sqlite command
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:10:39AM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 08:43:47PM -0700, David M. Cook wrote:
> >
> > * DBAPI compliance is important to me. sqlite is only one of the DBs I'd
> > like to support in my apps.
>
> Do you
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 02:07:58PM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote:
> Hi. I've been working on some refactoring of the Python bindings for
Sounds great, thanks for your work on this. Some things I'd like to see in
a sqlite wrapper:
* DBAPI compliance is important to me. sqlite is only one of the DBs
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 01:28:05AM +0800, cai yuan wrote:
>"To change a table you have to delete it (saving its contents to a temporary
>table) and recreate it from scratch." (Stated in
>http://www.hwaci.com/sw/sqlite/omitted.html) Does it mean when I use the
>"UPDATE ..." SQL statement, the table
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:09:49PM -0700, Cliff Hudson wrote:
> engine in a mobile device. Foreign key constraints are one of the features
> I would like to see in any database engine we eventually use. According to
> the web site, this feature is not yet implemented, and the mailing list
This
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:07:43PM +0200, bo wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Does anybody know if there is a switch to have sqlite writing out the
> column header names with every select statement?
.headers
.help to see all the . commands.
Dave Cook
---
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:22:29AM -0500, jim wrote:
> for some reason they are trying to name the constraint. no idea why.
That determines the name of the index that will be used to implement the
constraint.
> It appears sqlitemanager doesn't use it.
Yup, it looks like sqlite ignores the cons
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 05:15:15PM -0500, jim wrote:
> if they already have these constraints at the column level,
> why do they need them a second time as in ...
> name [type] [[CONSTRAINT name] column-constraint]*
Because you may want a composite primary key or set of unique columns. A
simple
I've written a little Python module to generate sqlite schemas. Why?
My initial reason was that I wanted to have some metadata for my
application, and the easiest way to do that was to encapsulate the data into
some objects and then use those to generate the needed SQL (this was after I
gave up tr
20 matches
Mail list logo
