raint error message.
I'm afraid that I need to implement that validations manually in js on the
save action :(
Thanks for your help!
Rafa
El 05/11/13 03:12, Alek Paunov escribió:
On 04.11.2013 11:46, Rafa de Miguel wrote:
Yes, I knew that but that info it doesn't really help me
Yes, I knew that but that info it doesn't really help me too much
El 04/11/13 10:33, Stephan Beal escribió:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Rafa de Miguel <
rafael.demig...@openbravo.com> wrote:
Do I have control about the WebSQL version or it's Chrome whom decide it?
FW
escribió:
Rafa de Miguel wrote:
Is there a way to know which constraint is being violated when you receive the
message constraint error 19:
In example: my_column_name UNIQUE constraint
Upgrade SQLite:
sqlite> create table t(x unique);
sqlite> insert into t values(1);
sqlite> insert
Hello all,
Is there a way to know which constraint is being violated when you receive
the message constraint error 19:
http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/c_abort.html #define SQLITE_CONSTRAINT 19 /*
Abort due to constraint violation */
In example: my_column_name UNIQUE constraint
I'm using Web
.
Miguel
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
On Jan 14, 2008 9:09 AM, Vishal Mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sno | id | amount
> > > 1| 1 | 200
> > > 2| 1 | 300
> > > 3 | 2 | 100
> > > 4 | 2 | 100
> > > 5 | 1 | 500
> What if I do not have control over sno i.e it is random or unpredictable ,
> I want to subtract it in
select * from table limit (n-1),(m-n)
n-1 because it is 0-based
http://www.sqlite.org/lang_select.html
On 10/8/07, Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello. This is probably a stupid question, but...
>
> Is there any way to include some phrase in a SELECT clause that will
> match only t
ou
> get when you finally link it into an exe. what is the problem here?
>
> On 9/2/07, Miguel Fuentes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > I just managed to compile Sqlite 3.4.2 under VC++(Visual C++ 2005
> Express
> > Edition, the free one). My problem is
nd no debugging information.
I'm using the amalgamation source file( I don't know if that really makes
any difference)
It's quite big comparing to the .exe supplied for windows
( by the way, how was sqlite3.exe - - compiled? which compiler and settings
were used?)
Thanks,
Miguel Fuentes
Igor has answered this before. Roughly:
1. all tables has an implicit integer column named "rowid" that is
auto increment
2. creating an integer primary key effectively "renames" rowid to that
column, so in your case below fields id and rowid are the same
IIRC drh replied something else, and sinc
Or, attach then INSERT-SELECT
On 7/25/07, Mohd Radzi Ibrahim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about dumping and import into new db?
- Original Message -
From: "Colin Manning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 7:05 AM
Subject: [sqlite] Saving an in-memory database to
Maybe you really have to loop "outside" sqlite to align the rows &
values. From the result you got and the UPDATE documentation, I can
guess that the subselect in the assignment is flattened to a scalar.
Unfortunately sqlite does not have something like
update tbl1 set col=tbl2.col from tbl2 wher
I am the author of the package SQLiteDF for R (a statistical package),
some sort of sqlite backed "data set". It's "raison d'etre" is to deal
with very large datasets, which could be tables with thousands of
columns. I am not much on the infinite length sql statement, but I
need lots of columns in
You have to link against sqlite's shared lib, e.g. in linux
$ gcc -L/path/to/sqlite/stuffs -I/path/to/sqlite/stuffs -lsqlite prog.c
(the 2nd is a capital i, the 3rd a small L)
Cheers,
M. Manese
On 4/4/07, nshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I upgraded from 3.3.1.3 to 3.3.1.4. Up till now, I've
On 2/22/07, Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, I'm stuck on the proper SQL syntax. A nudge in the right
direction -- including pointers to the appropriate documentation -- would be
much appreciated.
The "rule of thumb" is that anything that appears in the group-by
clause can app
This is not actually about SQLite. man umask
M. Manese
On 2/22/07, Shan, Zhe (Jay) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
If to use SQLite to create a database in Linux, the database file will
be granted permission 644 as default.
Is this value hardcoded in the current version? Is it possible to
chang
There is almost no restrictions, just put it inside square brackets
create table foobar ([my $0.02 column] int, ...)
M. Manese
On 2/20/07, Pablo Santacruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to know if there is any restriction on table names.
Thanks in advance
--
Pablo
---
rds,
Brodie
John Stanton wrote:
Your program does not free the memory malloc'd by sqlite3_errmsg by
calling sqlite3_free. I guess that Valgrind is telling you that. You
don't have to worry about Sqlite.
Jose Miguel Goncalves wrote:
Hi,
Running a simple sqlite3_open()/sqlite3_close() pr
Hi,
Running a simple sqlite3_open()/sqlite3_close() program (attached) I get a
report of a possible memory leak in valgrind:
$ valgrind --leak-check=full ./test_sqlite
==11992== Memcheck, a memory error detector.
==11992== Copyright (C) 2002-2006, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==11992
I know.
I checked them all and at least they are dangerous and probably not obvious.
I think the one in os_win.c is really a bug unless the intention were to
always return OK.
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PR
I already filtered out all the "common" warnings but these:
build.c(1969): remark #1599: declaration hides variable "v" (declared at
line 1883)
Vdbe *v = sqlite3GetVdbe(pParse);
^
expr.c(1520): remark #1599: declaration hides variable "op" (declared at
line 1489)
Oops. Ok, I got it. Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Lattest cvs sqlite version:
If SQLITE_OMIT_VIRTUALTABLE is defined linker complains about:
parse.obj : error unresolved external symbol _sqlite3VtabArgExtend in
function _yy_reduce
parse.obj : error unresolved external symbol _sqlite3VtabArgInit in function
_yy_reduce
parse.obj : error unreso
able
> to type
>
> package require sqlite3
$ tclsh
% package require sqlite3
3.3.5
%
Excellent -- thanks for the tip, Thomas.
--
Miguel Bazdresch
On 4/7/06, Miguel Bazdresch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. For some reason, the libraries needed for tcl interaction
> (libtclsqlite3.so) are not installed by 'make install'
I finally determined they *are* installed, to /usr/lib/tcl8.4/sqlite3.
A mention of this somew
On 4/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Miguel Bazdresch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I must be missing something obvious, but I can't figure out how to
> > compile/install the tcl bindings. I've been trying to install
> >
; and 'make install'.
In case this is useful, after 'make install' I have:
[/tmp/build]$ ls -l .libs/tcl*
-rw-r--r-- 1 miguel users 77K Apr 6 20:34 .libs/tclsqlite.o
[/tmp/build]$ ls -l .libs/libtcl*
-rw-r--r-- 1 miguel users 1.5M Apr 6 20:34 .libs/libtclsqlite3.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1
Is there any list of future enhancements, new features, etc on sqlite we can
drool for?
I think there is a logic error in check in 3056:
void *sqlite3Realloc(void *p, int n){
void *np = 0;
if( !sqlite3MallocFailed() ){
#ifndef SQLITE_ENABLE_MEMORY_MANAGEMENT
int oldsize = OSSIZEOF(p);
#endif
while( (np = OSREALLOC(p, n))==0 && sqlite3_release_memory(n) );
if( !np || hand
No bugs, just "benign" warnings.
btree.c
.\Sqlite\v3\btree.c(432): remark #1418: external definition with no prior
declaration
int sqlite3_btree_trace=0; /* True to enable tracing */
^
This variable is only used here and in test3.c.
I guess it should be enclosed between the #if SQLITE_T
I will point out only some kind of warnings I saw (i.e. not signed vs
unsigned) using the Intel Compiler:
os_win.c
.\Sqlite\v3\os_win.c(1482): warning #300: const variable "zeroData" requires
an initializer
static const ThreadData zeroData;
^
the patch was
Since these are nots a bug I will post them here my findings with 3.3.2 with
Intel compiler (one of the best and fast compiled code I've seen) under
Windows:
attach.c
.\Sqlite\v3\attach.c(36): remark #1418: external definition with no prior
declaration
int resolveAttachExpr(NameContext *pNam
I usually create a worker thread to send log lines through UDP to a syslog.
UDP is damm fast and you do not have to wait.
I'm the one who posted ticket 1601.
I have a multithreaded sqlite tcp server, and it ran fine with 2.8.x and 3.x
versions, but this "feature" is a stopper for me.
I think there is no difference using a dll or not, there is no way to free
that thread memory allocated, since that function it us
Just for the records.
I just compiled sqlite 3.2.8 with a new compiler (Intel 9.0) and gives these
warnings (among many others):
attach.c
.\Sqlite\v3\attach.c(142): remark #1599: declaration hides variable "i"
(declared at line 34)
int i = db->nDb - 1;
date.c
.\Sqlite\v3\date.c(506): r
I think it would be useful to have a function like sqlite3_function_needed
called from the parser (or whatever module) to give the application an
opportunity to register the needed function seen in a SQL statement.
The idea came up from the sqlite3_collation_needed function which registers
a c
Shouldn't temp_store_directory be private to a sqlite3 structure?
Currently it is global (in os_*.c), so setting a value through the pragma
affects to all currently opened sqlite connections within the process which
may be undesirable.
I guess the basic idea is to keep as minimum global variab
Thank you very much. That was really fast help!
Miguel Munoz
-Original Message-
From: Dan Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: viernes, 20 de mayo de 2005 10:56
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Problem with memory using Tcl-defined SQL
functions
> The problem
y the first block is freed. Do you think that this can be the problem?
Please, tell me if someone has had this kind of problem before. And, any
idea of how to solve it?
Thanks a lot.
Miguel Muñoz
GMV S.A.
http://www.gmv.es/
Well, here goes the s
Hello everybody.
I'm trying to compile php 5.0.3 using the
--with-sqlite=/usr/local/sqlite/lib option among some others and I
obtain the following error code:
checking whether to enable UTF-8 support in sqlite (default:
ISO-8859-1)... no
checking for sqlite support... yes
checking for sqlite_ope
tp://www.smartpethealth.com
-Original Message-
From: Miguel Angel Latorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 6:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Compress/uncompress inline
I've done it adding some compression user functions, compress and
decompress (
The encode and decode sources were removed from the src dir, it would be
nice to have them such files and alike (md5, etc) in the csv contrib dir.
I've done it adding some compression user functions, compress and decompress
(using zlib), also the encode and decode binary functions were added so I
could throw some sql in ascii and have the engine compress it:
for example:
insert into table (field1) values (compress (decode (ascii data)))
Read the documentation:
"The first parameter is a prepared SQL statement. If this statement is a
SELECT statement, the Nth column of the returned result set of the SELECT is
a table column then the declared type of the table column is returned. If
the Nth column of the result set is not at table co
Is there any way to backup a database so it leaves the backup file and the
original vaccum'ed?
That way one could use cron, at, or whatever to programatically run a backup
using the shell or alike to backup databases and keeping the new ones
vacuum'ed. It would be useful.
Refactoring vacuum.c?
Any
Shouldn't vdbeaux.c line 753:
rc = sqlite3BtreeFactory(db, ":memory:", 0, TEMP_PAGES, &pAgg->pBtree);
obey the TEMP_STORE macro so it is stored either in memory or disk?
I know it's there for speed, but that's what TEMP_STORE is for. Isn't it?
If I change in that line the ":memory:" to a 0 (zero)
It's not really (or not only) Windows the culprit but rather the compilers
that implement lazy memory managers. In my experience, Borland had rather
slow functions, always beaten by microsoft (sorry :( ).
For instance, there are out some C compilers like LCC that (as I'm told)
does not implement an
Using v.3.0.5 and executing:
explain pragma page_size;
or whatever pragma is entered,
it throws an assert in function sqlite3VdbeSetNumCols called from main.c
line 1037:
sqlite3VdbeSetNumCols(sParse.pVdbe, 5);
I agree.
Applications shouldn't worry about locking and timeouts. That would be the
job for the db core engine, returning as few (none ideally) busy status code
as possible.
Also, it is not always possible to decide which thread is better to rollback
since no info is provided about the status of w
Thanks, I already knew that.
I am trying to return to the user the "famous" affected rows state, but I am
not able to know before hand whether it's a create table, select, update,
etc statement.
So if sqlite3_column_count == 0 the I am positive it is not a select and it
's possibly an insert or upd
I just discovered that malformed pragma's statements return SQLITE_DONE.
For instance "pragma table_info (foo);"
if table "foo" does not exist, SQLITE_DONE is returned.
Also occurs in completely malformed pragma's like "pragma x;".
Also verified in v.2.8.13
One question:
I'm returning a recordset
>You are correct that LIKE and GLOB only work for 7-bit ascii
>strings. If you need a LIKE and GLOB that work with Unicode,
>you can register alternative LIKE and GLOB functions using
>the sqlite3_create_function() API.
Yes, I know it can be done that way. BTW, I'm not using Unicode. :)
I meant
Shoudn't the LIKE and GLOB function use a collation if present (either in
column definition or by the COLLATE xxx word) ?
The new collation functions are used to compare strings, and that's what
LIKE and GLOB do (sort of).
That way it would correctly handle the > ASCII(127) characters.
--
Miguel
Hi all.
I have a db v.3.0.1 of 32Mb with a single table and 598356 rows (no
indexes).
Doing a insert xx into select ...
using no joins, only sums and groups by, it takes hours to complete.
Besides RAM comsumption raises up to 500MB or more till I ran out of virtual
memory.
Rows are small in size.
all be done or undone.
- Original Message -
From: "kenneth long" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Miguel_Angel_Latorre_Díaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Bug or it makes sense?
> Miguel,
>
> I suspect tha
Ok. But if one just does (also tried with the .read metacommand):
sqlite3_exec (db, "begin; create table foo (value1 integer, value2 integer);
just an error; commit;", rest of params...)
should it do the same?
To me, the "begin; ..." is a whole multi statement which should be done
whitin a transac
Ok. But if one just does:
sqlite3_exec ("begin; create table foo (value1 integer, value2 integer);
just an error; commit;", ...)
should it do the same?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mai
SQLite version 3.0.1
Enter ".help" for instructions
sqlite> .tables
sqlite> begin;
sqlite> create table foo (value1 integer, value2 integer);
sqlite> just an error;
SQL error: near "just": syntax error
sqlite> commit;
sqlite> .tables
foo
sqlite>
This was using "shell :memory:" but same happens usi
I think version 3.x should do sorting and grouping on disk. Using temporary
tables?
Once we have btrees, why not using them?
It may not be the fastest way of doing it, but it saves lots of memory.
Perhaps it could begin doing it in memory and when reaching some certain
value it could use the extern
59 matches
Mail list logo
