Patches are still welcome, I guess. I haven't seen anybody claiming
that this would be done in any way.
On 6 June 2017 at 15:17, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> how its the status of this work?
>
> a limited implementation will be good!
>
> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
> http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.
Seeing how SQLite was created in 2000, it seems like nobody really
needed this feature for the last 17 years enough in order to actually
implement it.
Last I heard, patches are welcome on this mailing list. Don't keep us waiting.
Kind regards,
Daniel
On 20 March 2017 at 21:09, PICCORO McKAY Lenz
You can use sqlite3_auto_extension for this.
On 19 March 2017 at 11:35, R Smith wrote:
>
> On 2017/03/19 11:05 AM, petern wrote:
>>
>> Taking DRH's remarks about learning tclsqlite for the efficient coding to
>> heart, I discovered a big problem.
>>
>> Here is the simplest example from the docs a
Thanks a ton for the replies. This pretty much confirms what I've been
suspecting.
On 3 February 2017 at 11:24, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> The FTS and R-tree virtual tables do not contain NULL values, so
> I guess it was never seen as necessary.
Does this make it an accidental omission, then? Woul
Hi.
I'd like to ask why using a IS NULL or IS NOT NULL constraint in a
query made to a virtual table does not result in these constraints
being present in the sqlite3_index_info structure passed to the
virtual table's xBestIndex.
Currently, using one of these constraints results in no constraints a
I have problem with filtering database with LIKE statement. In query i'm doing
this:
...
WHERE [EMAIL PROTECTED] AND (ze_nazwa LIKE @ze_nazwa ESCAPE '\' OR ze_typ_el
LIKE @ze_nazwa ESCAPE '\')
and in program for @ze_nazwa i'm inserting this string:
string elementFiltr = "%" + (new
Regex(@"([\\%_
such
database ? How large should it be ? If yes, then is there a better way to
create large files than massive insterts/deletes ?
Thanks in advance,
Kamil
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
- Original Message -
From: "Brandon, Nicholas (UK)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: [sqlite] Performance of two queries, why such big difference ?
It takes <1ms to return 16 rows using the first query, but over 200ms
when using the second
r 200ms when
using the second one. What is wrong ? Is there a way to speed up the second
query ?
Thanks in advance,
Kamil
I have to create a database schema in such case.
Thanks in advance,
Kamil
10 matches
Mail list logo