On 2018-03-29 12:47, Wout Mertens wrote:
> I noticed that `.dump` does not output the user_version pragma. It
> seems to me that that is part of the database data?
I have run into this too. I was trying to transport Mozilla browser
"places" database this way, and it turned out their code cares a
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018, 8:18 AM Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 3/29/18, Scott Robison wrote:
> > It seems a
> > reasonable to suggestion to add it.
>
> Version 3.23.0 is in bug-fix-only mode. It'll have to wait.
>
Of course. I wasn't suggesting that it should be done with all haste, just
agreeing wit
On 29 Mar 2018, at 3:10pm, Scott Robison wrote:
> Yet as he said, user_version is data. It can be queried and can be
> checked to make decisions about what to do with the data. It seems a
> reasonable to suggestion to add it.
On consideration, I see the point. Would you want to dump
PRAGMA s
On 3/29/18, Scott Robison wrote:
> It seems a
> reasonable to suggestion to add it.
Version 3.23.0 is in bug-fix-only mode. It'll have to wait.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
htt
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Mar 2018, at 1:47pm, Wout Mertens wrote:
>
>> I noticed that `.dump` does not output the user_version pragma. It seems to
>> me that that is part of the database data?
>>
>> I don't actually use it, but it might be interesting to ad
On 29 Mar 2018, at 1:47pm, Wout Mertens wrote:
> I noticed that `.dump` does not output the user_version pragma. It seems to
> me that that is part of the database data?
>
> I don't actually use it, but it might be interesting to add this for
> completeness?
.dump is for things which affect d
I noticed that `.dump` does not output the user_version pragma. It seems to
me that that is part of the database data?
I don't actually use it, but it might be interesting to add this for
completeness?
sqlite> .dump
PRAGMA foreign_keys=OFF;
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
COMMIT;
sqlite> pragma user_version=5
7 matches
Mail list logo