On 08.01.2017 12:54, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
Kirill Müller wrote:
... there's no portable support for 64-bit integers.
That's what SQLite looks at SQLITE_INT64_TYPE.
The patch introduces SQLITE_UINT64_TYPE.
I'm working around this issue by using a struct of size 8
A struct of size 8 does no
On 08.01.2017 21:24, Richard Hipp wrote:
On 1/7/17, Kirill Müller wrote:
I'm in a situation [1] where I compile RSQLite as part of a C++ project
that still uses the C++98 standard.
Can you instead compile SQLite as a library (libsqlite3.a) using gcc
or clang, then link the compiled *.a file in
On 08.01.2017 17:38, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
Kirill Müller wrote:
... there's no portable support for 64-bit integers.
I'm working around this issue by using a struct of size 8
I'm open to alternatives.
What's wrong with SQLITE_INT64_TYPE?
(Even older C++ compilers should have the C .)
Thanks.
On 1/7/17, Kirill Müller wrote:
>
> I'm in a situation [1] where I compile RSQLite as part of a C++ project
> that still uses the C++98 standard.
Can you instead compile SQLite as a library (libsqlite3.a) using gcc
or clang, then link the compiled *.a file into your project, so that
your C++98 co
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Kirill Müller wrote:
> On 08.01.2017 14:20, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>> Kirill Müller wrote:
>>> On 08.01.2017 12:54, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
Kirill Müller wrote:
> ... there's no portable support for 64-bit integers.
> I'm working around this issue by usi
Kirill Müller wrote:
> ... there's no portable support for 64-bit integers.
> I'm working around this issue by using a struct of size 8
>
> I'm open to alternatives.
What's wrong with SQLITE_INT64_TYPE?
(Even older C++ compilers should have the C .)
Regards,
Clemens
_
On 08.01.2017 14:20, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
Kirill Müller wrote:
On 08.01.2017 12:54, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
Kirill Müller wrote:
... there's no portable support for 64-bit integers.
I'm working around this issue by using a struct of size 8
A struct of size 8 does not behave the same as an in
Kirill Müller wrote:
> On 08.01.2017 12:54, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>> Kirill Müller wrote:
>>> ... there's no portable support for 64-bit integers.
>>> I'm working around this issue by using a struct of size 8
>>
>> A struct of size 8 does not behave the same as an integer type.
>>
> For compiling
On 08.01.2017 12:54, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
Kirill Müller wrote:
... there's no portable support for 64-bit integers.
That's what SQLite looks at SQLITE_INT64_TYPE.
The patch introduces SQLITE_UINT64_TYPE.
I'm working around this issue by using a struct of size 8
A struct of size 8 does no
Kirill Müller wrote:
> ... there's no portable support for 64-bit integers.
That's what SQLite looks at SQLITE_INT64_TYPE.
> I'm working around this issue by using a struct of size 8
A struct of size 8 does not behave the same as an integer type.
> Currently I'm applying the attached patch
Thi
Hi all
I'm in a situation [1] where I compile RSQLite as part of a C++ project
that still uses the C++98 standard. This means there's no portable
support for 64-bit integers. I'm working around this issue by using a
struct of size 8, but this means I need to override the "unsigned 64-bit
typ
11 matches
Mail list logo