On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 17:36:37 +0200
Philip Bennefall wrote:
> Do you have any views on compiling SqLite optimized for speed rather
> than size?
These days, size is speed. The smaller the code, the better it fits in
cache, the faster it runs. The days of unrolling loops to avoid
branches in the p
On 4 Jul 2013, at 4:36pm, Philip Bennefall wrote:
> Thanks for that info. Do you have any views on compiling SqLite optimized for
> speed rather than size? Is the difference in performance generally small
> enough to be ignored? I am using Vc++ 2010 express and have been optimizing
> for spee
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Kennedy"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [sqlite] DLL Size differences and other info requested
On 07/04/2013 05:49 AM, Philip Bennefall wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I don't know what compiler is used to build the official
On 07/04/2013 05:49 AM, Philip Bennefall wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I don't know what compiler is used to build the official SqLite dll,
but provided it is some version of Vc++ my experience is that MinGw
often produces larger and sometimes significantly slower binaries on
Windows than VC++ does. In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/13 16:38, Stephen Chrzanowski wrote:
> I just reduced my built file size to BELOW what comes "out of the box"
> from sqlite.org. I've turned off all optimizations and ran a full
> build. I'm now sitting at the 599k mark.
You probably want -
huge)
From: Stephen Chrzanowski
To: Fehmi Noyan ISI ; General Discussion of SQLite
Database
Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: [sqlite] DLL Size differences and other info requested
I just reduced my built file size to BELOW what comes "out of the box" f
I just reduced my built file size to BELOW what comes "out of the box" from
sqlite.org. I've turned off all optimizations and ran a full build. I'm
now sitting at the 599k mark. So, the next process I'm going to have to
come up with some testing to validate whether optimizations should be
turned
n Chrzanowski
> To: rsm...@rsweb.co.za; General Discussion of SQLite Database <
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 8:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] DLL Size differences and other info requested
>
>
> That link certainly helps. I'll poke at '
ze significantly in some cases.
From: Stephen Chrzanowski
To: rsm...@rsweb.co.za; General Discussion of SQLite Database
Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: [sqlite] DLL Size differences and other info requested
That link certainly helps. I'll poke at &#
That link certainly helps. I'll poke at 'em.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:53 PM, RSmith wrote:
> Simply manipulating the compile-time options will create widely differing
> sizes. You can exclude older support items etc.
> A good overview of the compile-time options are given on the SQLite site.
>
Simply manipulating the compile-time options will create widely differing
sizes. You can exclude older support items etc.
A good overview of the compile-time options are given on the SQLite site.
(Ok I'll stop being lazy and find you the actual link)
http://www.sqlite.org/compile.html
There, go
From: "Stephen Chrzanowski"
To: "General Discussion of SQLite Database"
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 12:37 AM
Subject: [sqlite] DLL Size differences and other info requested
Just for kicks because I wanted to learn "how it was done", I decided to
download the
Just for kicks because I wanted to learn "how it was done", I decided to
download the amalgamation code and compile to a Win32 DLL. The secondary
purpose of my doing so was that I also wanted to write a 3rd party app
that'd export all headers of the amalgamation to a different format that I
can th
13 matches
Mail list logo
