Hey,
Just saw your post. Really interesting stuff. Thanks a bunch!
- Jens
On Apr 16, 12:24 pm, Alexey Pechnikov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thursday 15 April 2010 11:21:17 Jens wrote:
>
> > I'd appreciate any feedback you might have one this. Also, does anyone
> > have experience with sqlite+ft3 and
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Alexey Pechnikov
wrote:
> And you can use my patches for zlib-compression for FTS3. I'm planning to make
> the "fts3z" extension because I want to use as original FTS3
> as FTS3 with compression together.
Back when I was working up fts1, I experimented with compre
Hello!
On Thursday 15 April 2010 11:21:17 Jens wrote:
> I'd appreciate any feedback you might have one this. Also, does anyone
> have experience with sqlite+ft3 and high-availability solutions? Has
> anyone done any benchmarking of fts3?
I did test FTS3 on about 400 millions of records and there
Thanks for your feedback. I gonna keep my data in my main RDBMS
instead (which supports full-text searching as well). If it's too
slow, i still have to option of setting up a database cluster or
something.
On Apr 15, 1:41 pm, Simon Slavin wrote:
> On 15 Apr 2010, at 8:21am, Jens wrote:
>
> > I'd
On 15 Apr 2010, at 8:21am, Jens wrote:
> I'd appreciate any feedback you might have one this. Also, does anyone
> have experience with sqlite+ft3 and high-availability solutions? Has
> anyone done any benchmarking of fts3?
For a start, FTS3 is a very specific solution to a very specific problem.
So I'm building this web-site solution where high performance is a
clear requirement. Pages content should not be static, but rather put
together on the basis of supplied search criteria (basically tags);
The page must include content for which associated tags match the
supplied search criteria.
6 matches
Mail list logo
