Dynamics, Inc.
BK> --- On Tue, 11/30/10, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
BK> From: Igor Tandetnik
BK> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Just compiled SQLite in Visual Studio
BK> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
BK> Date: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 8:06 PM
BK> Bob Keeland wrote:
>> Oh, from
ole thread?
Bob Keeland
Forest Dynamics, Inc.
--- On Tue, 11/30/10, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
From: Igor Tandetnik
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Just compiled SQLite in Visual Studio
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Date: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 8:06 PM
Bob Keeland wrote:
> Oh, from the various replies
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> Chris Wolf wrote:
>
>> It depends on your definition of "object". I hate to nit-pick, but for
>> me, "object" may
>> contain data or code or both data and code. So with this definition, C
>> implements objects
>> without code.
>>
>
> Is there really a fundamenta
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 03:49:40AM -0500, Chris Wolf scratched on the wall:
> It depends on your definition of "object". I hate to nit-pick, but for
> me, "object" may contain data or code or both data and code. So with
> this definition, C implements objects without code.
C++ classes don't "
Chris Wolf wrote:
> It depends on your definition of "object". I hate to nit-pick, but for
> me, "object" may
> contain data or code or both data and code. So with this definition, C
> implements objects
> without code.
Is there really a fundamental difference between
struct X {
int data;
>From: john darnell
>Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:10:04 -0600
>
>I just added it to a Visual Studio 8 project, turned off the use of
>precompiled
>headers (the project is a C++ project) and compiled the SQLite.c >file without
>any errors. Is it really that easy, or am I about ready to be hit by a
e-users-boun...@sqlite.org
> [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Bob Keeland
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 5:02 PM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Just compiled SQLite in Visual Studio
>
> OK then I have a newbee question tha
Dustin Sallings wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2010, at 18:04, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>
>> It is true, however, that it's fairly easy to transform any C program into a
>> program that's both valid C and C++, by applying
>> straightforward modifications - tightening type safety and such.
>
> Except there a
On Nov 30, 2010, at 18:04, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> It is true, however, that it's fairly easy to transform any C program into a
> program that's both valid C and C++, by applying straightforward
> modifications - tightening type safety and such.
Except there are a lot of areas where C
On 11/30/2010 9:04 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
> Oh. No matter. It's the one Apple's Xcode calls and it's being very clever
> about what language it's compiling. It defeated my test.
>
> Simon.
a quick google query seems to imply that Xcode uses the Gnu Compiler
Collection (gcc, g++, gcj, gfortan
Bob Keeland wrote:
> Oh, from the various replies I see that C++ is a more capable extension of C.
> Igor was only using a figure of speech, kind of.
Everything I said in this thread so far, I meant quite literally. Which
expression of mine do you take as a figure of speech?
--
Igor Tandetnik
On 1 Dec 2010, at 1:46am, Reid Thompson wrote:
> On 11/30/2010 8:42 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>> On 1 Dec 2010, at 1:33am, Jay A. Kreibich wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:10:51AM +, Simon Slavin scratched on the
>>> wall:
>>>
So every C program is a C++ program,
>>> Not true.
Simon Slavin wrote:
> So every C program is a C++ program
Not quite true. Here are a few examples that are valid C but invalid C++:
/* implicit 'int' return type */
f();
/* implicit conversion from void* to any pointer type */
char* p = malloc(100);
// calling a function without first declar
Bob Keeland wrote:
> OK then I have a newbee question that is actually out of the scope of SQLite.
> If the only difference between C and C++ is the
> file extension, then what is the difference between C and C++?
Since the premise of the question is false, any conclusion whatsoever may
logical
On 11/30/2010 8:42 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2010, at 1:33am, Jay A. Kreibich wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:10:51AM +, Simon Slavin scratched on the wall:
>>
>>> So every C program is a C++ program,
>> Not true.
>>
>> Try to compile sqlite3.c with a C++ compiler and see ho
On 1 Dec 2010, at 1:33am, Jay A. Kreibich wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:10:51AM +, Simon Slavin scratched on the wall:
>
>> So every C program is a C++ program,
>
> Not true.
>
> Try to compile sqlite3.c with a C++ compiler and see how far you get.
Can you explain the problem to
On 11/30/2010 10:18 PM, Doug wrote:
> Objects exist in
> C++, and they don't in C
actually objects can and do exist in C, it's just a matter of writing
them. C++ added the extensions to make writing/managing them easier.
http://www.google.com/search?q=object+oriented+programming+in+C&ie=ut
compiled SQLite in Visual Studio
To: "General Discussion of SQLite Database"
Date: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 7:10 PM
On 1 Dec 2010, at 1:01am, Bob Keeland wrote:
> OK then I have a newbee question that is actually out of the scope of SQLite.
> If the only difference between
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:10:51AM +, Simon Slavin scratched on the wall:
> So every C program is a C++ program,
Not true.
Try to compile sqlite3.c with a C++ compiler and see how far you get.
-j
--
Jay A. Kreibich < J A Y @ K R E I B I.C H >
"Intelligence is like underwear:
lite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Bob Keeland
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 5:02 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Just compiled SQLite in Visual Studio
OK then I have a newbee question that is actually out of the scope of
On 1 Dec 2010, at 1:01am, Bob Keeland wrote:
> OK then I have a newbee question that is actually out of the scope of SQLite.
> If the only difference between C and C++ is the file extension,
No.
> then what is the difference between C and C++? I'm thinking of adding a
> language other than th
know the difference.
I've been thinking about Java, but am not sure yet.
Bob Keeland
--- On Tue, 11/30/10, john darnell wrote:
From: john darnell
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Just compiled SQLite in Visual Studio
To: "General Discussion of SQLite Database"
Date: Tuesday, Novembe
Thanks Igor.
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of Igor Tandetnik
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 7:11 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Just compiled SQLite in Visual Studio
john darnell wrote
john darnell wrote:
> I just added it to a Visual Studio 8 project, turned off the use of
> precompiled headers (the project is a C++ project) and
> compiled the SQLite.c file without any errors.
There is no such thing as a C++ project. A project in Visual Studio can happily
contain both C and
-
>> From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
>> [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
>> On Behalf Of Simon Slavin
>> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 5:39 PM
>> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
>> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Just compiled SQLite in Visual Studio
>
> On Behalf Of Simon Slavin
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 5:39 PM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Just compiled SQLite in Visual Studio
>
>
> On 29 Nov 2010, at 11:10pm, john darnell wrote:
>
> > here's that first dumb
On 29 Nov 2010, at 11:10pm, john darnell wrote:
> here's that first dumb-sounding question.
>
> I got my boss to purchase an O'Reilly book called Using SQLite, and the
> author makes a rather ominous statement: "All of the SQLite source is
> written in C...Make sure you use a vanilla C Compil
Hello Folks:
I just started a big project that needed an internal database manager and
SQLite looks like it will fit the bill. I am old hat with SQL but have
absolutely no experience with SQLite, so here's hoping that you folks are a
real friendly bunch and will help me get up to speed.
Promi
28 matches
Mail list logo