> On Mar 6, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Наиль Шигапов wrote:
>
> Today for fetch or write information from different thread, i lock thread if
> database is lock(write, read,e.t.c) But i don’t want lock my thread. I read
> from documentation about «vfs» technology in sqlite. Does it make sense to
> crea
Hellow!
I write small orm based on sqlite database from ios - application! I have one
or more question about multi-thread in sqlite.
Today for fetch or write information from different thread, i lock thread if
database is lock(write, read,e.t.c) But i don’t want lock my thread. I read
from do
Jim Morris wrote:
>
> at line 37428:
> while( cnt-->0 && (res = winLockFile(&pFile->h, SQLITE_LOCKFILE_FLAGS,
> PENDING_BYTE, 0, 1, 0))==0 ){
>
Are you using version 3.9.2 or some other version?
>
> cnt = 2
> locktype = 1//SHARED_LOCK
> lastErrno =
Problem is trying to get a shared lock in sqlite.c, "static int
winLock(sqlite3_file *id, int locktype)"
at line 37428:
while( cnt-->0 && (res = winLockFile(&pFile->h, SQLITE_LOCKFILE_FLAGS,
PENDING_BYTE, 0, 1, 0))==0 ){
cnt = 2
locktype = 1//SHARED_LO
No. The app works, however when I scroll the list there are may
requests to get records from the DB and it seems to interact with the
background thread to produce this error.
On 11/3/2015 7:02 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
> Jim Morris wrote:
>> Is there a graceful work around?
>>
>>
>>(38
Jim Morris wrote:
>
> Is there a graceful work around?
>
>
> (3850) SQLITE_IOERR_LOCK
>
Are any of the underlying database files read-only?
--
Joe Mistachkin
I have a connection used by the main (UI) thread and recently added a
background thread, with own connection(no shared cache) to upload
changes to server on Windows Mobile 6.0/6.5 devices and upgraded to
SQLite 3.9.2. The background thread is getting an error 10, extended
error 3850 as a resul
Hi,
I am using sqlite version 3.7.13 in a multithreaded application
(transactions with writes and reads will be called from different parallel
threads within one process), and I am trying to gain performance. I would
also like in some way to keep an on disk record of the database as the
program r
Hi, I probably asked about this before, but as I'm having some problems
with my implementation, I would like to ask more clear questions.
The main part of the application does not modify the database, but
quries it occasionally (select).
The other thread is responsible for the changes (import from
can coexist with a single RESERVED
lock. RESERVED differs from PENDING in that new SHARED locks can be
acquired while there is a RESERVED lock.
-Original Message-
From: Rafal Rusin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 March 2006 15:03
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite
Sqlite has 3 types of locks, which is weird for me.
Could You explain what is a "reserved lock"?
Read and read/write (exclusive) locks are apparent.
http://www.sqlite.org/capi3ref.html#sqlite3_busy_handler
Best Regards,
Rafal Rusin
TouK Company
(www.touk.pl)
On 3/13/06, Rafal Rusin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe you want to call this:
> >
> > " int sqlite3_busy_timeout(sqlite3*, int ms);
> >
> > This routine sets a busy handler that sleeps for a while when a table
> > is locked. The handler will sleep multiple times until at least "ms"
> > m
I had major problems with multithreaded access to a sqlite database file
on an NFS mount. While not exactly your scenerio there might be some
similarities. I had to come up with a crazy scheme to allow only one
thread to access the sqlite database at a time. See below.
I came up with a sch
> Maybe you want to call this:
>
> " int sqlite3_busy_timeout(sqlite3*, int ms);
>
> This routine sets a busy handler that sleeps for a while when a table
> is locked. The handler will sleep multiple times until at least "ms"
> milliseconds of sleeping have been done. After "ms" milliseconds o
On 3/13/06, Rafal Rusin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having problems with famous multithread bug
> "Database is locked".
> I tried to work around that with sqlite3_busy_timeout
> or busy_handler, but with no success. I had deadlocks.
> I was using version 3.3.4 on Debian Linux.
> Cou
Hello,
I'm having problems with famous multithread bug
"Database is locked".
I tried to work around that with sqlite3_busy_timeout
or busy_handler, but with no success. I had deadlocks.
I was using version 3.3.4 on Debian Linux.
Could You give me some links to discussion on that
topic?
Maybe there
16 matches
Mail list logo