>> > So make the wiki available for download. ;)
>>
>> I would like this too. ;)
>>
>> Often I'm working without an internet connection and a having a local
>> copy of the Wiki would be extremely useful.
>>
>
>Been working on this for years. Literally. I just never seem to
>find the time to c
"McDermott, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Guess you can't please everybody :-) Right now we have some
> > > documentation in the source tree and some on the wiki,
> > which I suppose
> > > is guaranteed to please nobody.
> >
> > So make the
Hi,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Guess you can't please everybody :-) Right now we have some
> > documentation in the source tree and some on the wiki,
> which I suppose
> > is guaranteed to please nobody.
>
> So make the wiki available for download. ;)
I would like this too. ;)
Ofte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guess you can't please everybody :-) Right now we have some
documentation in the source tree and some on the wiki, which
I suppose is guaranteed to please nobody.
So make the wiki available for download. ;)
Martin
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure you can. You just have to put the expression in parentheses
(to avoid a parsing conflict). Try this:
CREATE TABLE test1(
date TEXT DEFAULT (strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%f', 'now')),
dummy int
);
INSERT INTO test1(dummy) VALUES(1);
SELECT
On 2/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"P Kishor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> is it possible to add usage such as the above, and many, many
> wonderful SQL suggestions routinely provided by Igor Tandetnik (thanks
> Igor!) to the syntax docs in the form of user-submitted comme
"P Kishor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> is it possible to add usage such as the above, and many, many
> wonderful SQL suggestions routinely provided by Igor Tandetnik (thanks
> Igor!) to the syntax docs in the form of user-submitted comments?
>
I was trying to move all of the documentation int
On 2/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem is that you can't use a function like strftime as the
> default value for a column when you create a tbale. It only accepts
> NULL, a string constant, a number, or one of the magic curr
Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem is that you can't use a function like strftime as the
> default value for a column when you create a tbale. It only accepts
> NULL, a string constant, a number, or one of the magic current_* values.
>
Sure you can. You just have to put th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't a bug.
The magic current_timestamp keyword is really an alias for
"datetime('now')". And datetime('now') returns you a text
string in the format "YY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS". Yes, this means
that the seconds have been rounded to the nearest whole
second. But that
Doug Currie wrote:
Thanks for the links.
I repeated Joe's test on my XP box and plotted the results - it appears
that the time is adjusted by up to +/- 800us every 12/64ths of a second
and interpolated between. Interesting stuff, though I'm not convinced
that hectonanoseconds will catch on. :
Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sqlite> select strftime('%f', 'now');
> 0.622
> sqlite> select strftime('%f', current_timestamp);
> 34.000
>
> You might want to file a bug report about this.
>
This isn't a bug.
The magic current_timestamp keyword is really an alias
On Wednesday, February 21, 2007 Martin Jenkins wrote:
> Joe Wilson wrote:
>> So this machine's minimum timer resolution is 0.0155 seconds,
>> or 15.5 milliseconds.
> XP box?
> XP & timers: http://www.lochan.org/2005/keith-cl/useful/win32time.html
Also see the comments about timeBeginPeriod()
Tom Olson wrote:
Thank you for the reply. I ran the select statement you sent me as well as
testing it with 'now' and both do indeed show the fractional seconds,
however if I use current_timestamp I do not see the fractional seconds.
using 'now' should suffice as a workaround. Curious though?
Dr. H,
Thank you for the reply. I ran the select statement you sent me as well as
testing it with 'now' and both do indeed show the fractional seconds,
however if I use current_timestamp I do not see the fractional seconds.
using 'now' should suffice as a workaround. Curious though?
Kind Rega
Joe Wilson wrote:
So this machine's minimum timer resolution is 0.0155 seconds,
or 15.5 milliseconds.
XP box?
XP & timers: http://www.lochan.org/2005/keith-cl/useful/win32time.html
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, send email
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A double is sufficient to store the current time to with about
> 25 microseconds. If you use 'now' to get the current time, the
> date functions try to capture the current time to this precision.
> That is implemented in the os_XXX.c layer. It's system dependent.
>
Tom Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that SQLite uses a 64-bit floating point type to store Julian date
> information. Is this accurate to the second or a fraction of a second?
>
> I was doing some testing and tried to format a date using strftime() method
> with the %f optio
Hello,
I know that SQLite uses a 64-bit floating point type to store Julian date
information. Is this accurate to the second or a fraction of a second?
I was doing some testing and tried to format a date using strftime() method
with the %f option and I was unable to find a date that kept any mi
19 matches
Mail list logo
