Re: [sqlite] Proposed: drop support for LinuxThreads

2010-05-19 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On May 19, 2010, at 6:35 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 12 May 2010 11:43:13 D. Richard Hipp wrote: >> If we drop support for (the non-standard, non-compliant) LinuxThreads >> threading library and instead support only standard Posix threads >> implemented using NPTL, beginning with SQL

Re: [sqlite] Proposed: drop support for LinuxThreads

2010-05-12 Thread Matthew L. Creech
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:43 AM, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > If we drop support for (the non-standard, non-compliant) LinuxThreads > threading library and instead support only standard Posix threads > implemented using NPTL, beginning with SQLite release 3.7.0, what > disruptions might this cause? >

Re: [sqlite] Proposed: drop support for LinuxThreads

2010-05-12 Thread Bill King
On 05/13/2010 01:43 AM, ext D. Richard Hipp wrote: > If we drop support for (the non-standard, non-compliant) LinuxThreads > threading library and instead support only standard Posix threads > implemented using NPTL, beginning with SQLite release 3.7.0, what > disruptions might this cause? >

Re: [sqlite] Proposed: drop support for LinuxThreads

2010-05-12 Thread Florian Weimer
* D. Richard Hipp: > If we drop support for (the non-standard, non-compliant) LinuxThreads > threading library and instead support only standard Posix threads > implemented using NPTL, beginning with SQLite release 3.7.0, what > disruptions might this cause? There are several variants of NP

[sqlite] Proposed: drop support for LinuxThreads

2010-05-12 Thread D. Richard Hipp
If we drop support for (the non-standard, non-compliant) LinuxThreads threading library and instead support only standard Posix threads implemented using NPTL, beginning with SQLite release 3.7.0, what disruptions might this cause? Is anybody still using LinuxThreads? D. Richard Hipp d...@h