Al Danial wrote:
Just confirming that the patched code (cvs checkout this morning @ 8
AM PDT) works on the Opteron machine w/Gentoo 2004.1 amd_64 mentioned
earlier in this thread. Cool! Only two glitches left:
2 errors out of 14857 tests
Failures on these tests: printf-8.1 printf-8.2
the erro
Just confirming that the patched code (cvs checkout this morning @ 8
AM PDT) works on the Opteron machine w/Gentoo 2004.1 amd_64 mentioned
earlier in this thread. Cool! Only two glitches left:
2 errors out of 14857 tests
Failures on these tests: printf-8.1 printf-8.2
the errors are
print
Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> Works with the attached patch.
The patch is added. Tnx.
> Oh, forgot to mention that printf tests fail:
>
> They're all failures of this type:
> Expected: [Three integers: -1 17]
> Got: [Three integers: -1 377]
>
Can
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 04:13:57PM -0400, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> Please try the latest code in CVS and see if it helps. Tnx.
Works with the attached patch. Oh, forgot to mention that printf
tests fail:
Failures on these tests: printf-1.10.1 printf-1.10.2 printf-1.10.3 printf-1.10.4
printf-
Matt Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:53:30AM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote:
That's not the solution. Your btree cursor (and other pointers) are
being truncated:
Please try the latest code in CVS and see if it helps. Tnx.
--
D. Richard Hipp -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 704.948.4565
Matt Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:53:30AM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote:
That's not the solution. Your btree cursor (and other pointers) are
being truncated:
Here's a patch to correct this. There are also some cosmetic changes
to reduce warnings on 64 bit platforms. The patch may need to
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:53:30AM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> That's not the solution. Your btree cursor (and other pointers) are
> being truncated:
Here's a patch to correct this. There are also some cosmetic changes
to reduce warnings on 64 bit platforms. The patch may need to be
modified
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:10:35AM -0400, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> Please try again with the lastest version under CVS and see if it helps.
> Check-in [1948] will have fixed this problem if I am not badly mistaken.
That's not the solution. Your btree cursor (and other pointers) are
being trunc
Al Danial wrote:
On my 64 bit Linux system (Opteron, Gentoo 2004.1 amd_64), the v3.0.6
code builds fine but seg faults during 'make test' in one of the blob tests.
Today I built the code with debugging enabled and used gdb to get a
traceback. It failed at line 411 of src/util.c, in a strlen() call
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Al Danial wrote:
>On my 64 bit Linux system (Opteron, Gentoo 2004.1 amd_64), the v3.0.6
>code builds fine but seg faults during 'make test' in one of the blob tests.
>Today I built the code with debugging enabled and used gdb to get a
>traceback. It failed at line 411 of src/u
On my 64 bit Linux system (Opteron, Gentoo 2004.1 amd_64), the v3.0.6
code builds fine but seg faults during 'make test' in one of the blob tests.
Today I built the code with debugging enabled and used gdb to get a
traceback. It failed at line 411 of src/util.c, in a strlen() call.
407 nByt
Do the rumors apply to 64-bit Linux or do they apply
elsewhere? I can give you access to either my 64-bit
Fedora Core 2 desktop (self-built) or Fedora Core 2
laptop (eMachines M6805) and I have access to an Apple
G5 (unfortunately I can't give you access to it). I
remember trying to compile 2.8/3
You can try HP TestDrive (www.testdrive.compaq.com) or the sourceforge.net
compile farm.
>>-Original Message-
>>From: D. Richard Hipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 1:01 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: [sqlite] SQLite
I keep hearing rumors that SQLite is not working right on
64-bit unix. But lacking access to any 64-bit hardware,
there isn't much I can do about it.
Does anybody out there have a 64-bit unix box that they
can give me ssh access to so that I can test and debug
SQLite? Access can be intermittant (
14 matches
Mail list logo
