eople, but it's an issue if you're building for an embedded
platform.
Cheers,
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: D. Richard Hipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 October 2008 10:52
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] SQLite version 3.6.4
On Oct 15, 2
l Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: [sqlite] SQLite version 3.6.4
SQLite version 3.6.4 is now available for download on the SQLite
website:
http://www..sqlite.org/download.html
SQLite version 3.6.4 is considered a stable release. Upgrading from
version 3.6.3 is optional. For a sum
On Oct 15, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Dave Toll wrote:
> I found a small compile error when SQLITE_MUTEX_NOOP is defined with
> the
> amalgamation source:
>
SQLITE_MUTEX_NOOP is an internal symbol that gets set if and only if
you define SQLITE_THREADSAFE=0. You should not set SQLITE_MUTEX_NOOP
you
Try
http://sqlite.org/releaselog/3_6_4.html
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Alexey Pechnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hello!
>
> В сообщении от Wednesday 15 October 2008 16:11:47 D. Richard Hipp
> написал(а):
> > For a summary of changes and enhancements
> > that have occurred in version 3.
On Oct 15, 2008, at 8:11 AM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> SQLite version 3.6.4 is now available for download on the SQLite
> website:
>
> http://www..sqlite.org/download.html
>
> SQLite version 3.6.4 is considered a stable release. Upgrading from
> version 3.6.3 is optional. For a summary o
Hello!
В сообщении от Wednesday 15 October 2008 16:11:47 D. Richard Hipp написал(а):
> For a summary of changes and enhancements
> that have occurred in version 3.6.4 visit
>
> http://www.sqlite.org/3_6_4.html
Document Not Found
The document /3_6_4.html is not avaivable on this server
B
SQLite version 3.6.4 is now available for download on the SQLite
website:
http://www..sqlite.org/download.html
SQLite version 3.6.4 is considered a stable release. Upgrading from
version 3.6.3 is optional. For a summary of changes and enhancements
that have occurred in version 3.6.4
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2008, at 9:11 PM, dcharno wrote:
>
>>> If you have issues or concerns with any aspect of the upcoming
>>> release, now would be a good time to raise them.
>> Is there any way to have both the BNF and syntax diagrams in the SQL
>> Syntax?
>
>
> Not really. Ex
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:45:11AM +0300, Cariotoglou Mike wrote:
> well, since you asked, BNF is indeed more difficult to read, BUT it is
> machine-readable, which means validation tools and parsers can be built.
If that's what you want then there's already the grammar that Lemon uses
to generate
D. Richard Hipp schrieb:
> I suppose that announcements of this kind should really only be posted
> on the sqlite-dev mailing list, not on sqlite-users. So I will likely
> reframe from making subsequent pre-release announcements on sqlite-
> users and use only sqlite-dev for such purposes.
well, since you asked, BNF is indeed more difficult to read, BUT it is
machine-readable, which means validation tools and parsers can be built.
so, if you did have the BNF grammar *available* (as opposed to part of
the web documentation), I personally would be happier.
_
On Oct 9, 2008, at 9:11 PM, dcharno wrote:
>> If you have issues or concerns with any aspect of the upcoming
>> release, now would be a good time to raise them.
>
> Is there any way to have both the BNF and syntax diagrams in the SQL
> Syntax?
Not really. Explain to me again why you want BNF
> If you have issues or concerns with any aspect of the upcoming
> release, now would be a good time to raise them.
Is there any way to have both the BNF and syntax diagrams in the SQL Syntax?
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http
We are planning to release SQLite version 3.6.4 at approximately
2008-10-15 12:00:00 UTC. Additional information can be found on the
draft website:
http://www.sqlite.org/draft/index.html
If you have issues or concerns with any aspect of the upcoming
release, now would be a good time to
14 matches
Mail list logo
