Re: Spam: Re: [sqlite] Version 3.0.0 ALPHA now available

2004-06-19 Thread Hans-Juergen Taenzer
DJ Anubis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Le samedi 19 Juin 2004 09:28, Hans-Juergen Taenzer a écrit : >> But for example in the interface file sqlite(3).h there is not >> made use of this typedef (or INT64_TYPE defined in sqliteInt.h): >> >> long long int sqlite3_value_int64(sqlite3_value*);

Re: Spam: Re: [sqlite] Version 3.0.0 ALPHA now available

2004-06-19 Thread DJ Anubis
Le samedi 19 Juin 2004 09:28, Hans-Juergen Taenzer a écrit : > But for example in the interface file sqlite(3).h there is not made > use of this typedef (or INT64_TYPE defined in sqliteInt.h): > > long long int sqlite3_value_int64(sqlite3_value*); try to patch as: INT64_TYPE sqlite3_value_int64

Re: Spam: Re: [sqlite] Version 3.0.0 ALPHA now available

2004-06-19 Thread Hans-Juergen Taenzer
DJ Anubis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Le vendredi 18 Juin 2004 22:20, Hans-Juergen Taenzer a écrit : >> I don't think there would be problems with the new version 3.0 if >> there wasn't the problem with the 'long long' datatype. Just >> using a suitable typdef for this datatype would resolve

Re: Spam: Re: [sqlite] Version 3.0.0 ALPHA now available

2004-06-18 Thread DJ Anubis
Le vendredi 18 Juin 2004 22:20, Hans-Juergen Taenzer a écrit : > I don't think there would be problems with the new version 3.0 if > there wasn't the problem with the 'long long' datatype. Just using > a suitable typdef for this datatype would resolve the problem > (maybe there have to be changes t

Re: Spam: Re: [sqlite] Version 3.0.0 ALPHA now available

2004-06-18 Thread Hans-Juergen Taenzer
Hihn, Jason ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I am not the one to answer this, but I do know the mains that > KJSEmbed is going through at the moment. The whole delay is trying > to get it to compile in MSVC, but they moved to mingw32, where > it's much more standard. They've since been chugging a

RE: Spam: Re: [sqlite] Version 3.0.0 ALPHA now available

2004-06-18 Thread Hihn, Jason
reduced to days. I guess what I'm saying is MSVC didn't embrace ANSI enough. Could minw32 work for you? http://www.mingw.org/ -Original Message- From: Hans-Juergen Taenzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 2:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Spam: Re: [s