...@sun.com
> Subject: Re: Claims based authentication
> To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
> Scott Golightly wrote:
>
> > The first and most fundamental question is if we want the identity
> > providers to be interchangeable or interoperable.
>
> YES to bo
Scott Golightly wrote:
The first and most fundamental question is if we want the identity providers to
be interchangeable or interoperable.
YES to both.
We could probably build two initial identity providers:
- one using the Metro STS framework
- one using the Geneva framework
Hopefully th
t we as a group want to do in
the way of setup and then later on adding new accounts.
Scott Golightly
> From: kent.br...@microsoft.com
> To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Claims based authentication
> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:30:05 +
>
> Hi Scott,
&
?
Kent
-Original Message-
From: Scott Golightly [mailto:scott_goligh...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 12:58 PM
To: Stonehenge Development
Subject: Claims based authentication
I just uploaded changes to my proposal based on feedback I got from some
identity experts w
I just uploaded changes to my proposal based on feedback I got from some
identity experts who are not part of the Stonehenge project. Again the document
is in Word and PDF format to provide the broadest distribution possible.
If we as a group can agree in principle that we want to change the ap
