is there any special setting in tomcat 4 beta 5 to running struts..?
i tray to run the struts-example in tomcat 4 beta 5,
it doesn't run, there are error messages like this
A Servlet Exception Has Occurred
Exception Report:
javax.servlet.ServletException: Cannot find message resources under key
>
> Ron,
>
> I liked your Extension/ExtensionServlet - obviously to satisfy everyone it
> would have to be able to be registered at various points in ActionServlets
> process() method as well as the init() (e.g. processPreprocess() and
> processPopulate() methods).
>
> One small comment - shoul
I'm submitting the transformations package as a struts extension.
I've also updated the extensions package to include support for the
destroy() and initDigester() functions and repackaged the source/class
files
into a .zip file (thanks Niall, Ted).
What's a transformation? Briefly:
Transformatio
Hello -
I am trying to do the following with Tomcat and Struts but am not sure
how to go about it:
I want to implement a Servlet that dispatches / forwards to jsp
pages. Before the dispatch, however, I would like to set an attribute
of the PageContext of the jsp page that I will be dispatching
Rob,
I guess you already saw the previous thread about this, but in case you
didn't Olegs requirement for his bean factory are in the following messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg01763.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg017
Jetspeed has an object (or perhaps interface) called "portlet". The idea
is that you can set up a subscription to a news (or other) service, and
put several portlets together to build a portal.
The components package would be just the thing to display portlets, but
calling it portlets would be c
A little portal :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 June 2001 23:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Oleg V Alexeev
> Subject: Re[2]: New name for Components / Extended Templates?
>
>
> Sorry to be a bit dense, but 'portlets' isn't at all clear to
Sorry to be a bit dense, but 'portlets' isn't at all clear to me. Given
that I know what 'applets' and 'servlets' are, I would have guessed that
'portlets' had something to do with a TCP/IP (or maybe HTTP) port, but I
can't see how this would relate to Components, so I think I must be wrong.
W
Portlet gets my votes as well.
> -Original Message-
> From: Oleg V Alexeev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 June 2001 21:27
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re[2]: New name for Components / Extended Templates?
>
>
> Hello Chuck,
>
> Thursday, June 28, 2001, 11:14:00 PM, you wrot
Hello Chuck,
Thursday, June 28, 2001, 11:14:00 PM, you wrote:
CS> How about Portlet? When I look at the features that's the first thing that
CS> comes to mind.
Good choice. Components, blocks, pieces - all this terms do not point
to the general position of this package. Portlets term is clear
Note that the main motivation for the extensions package
at the link below was to avoid having to always extend
the ActionServlet.
As far as altering the behavior of things
like the action classes, forwards, etc.. I think a good
event/listener model could be used for most of those cases.
I think
Rob,
If you have a chance take at look at this
< http://www.rpsenterprises.com/struts/index.html >
and let us know what you think.
I agree that is very important that we look for ways for people to add
new functionality without subclassing everything in sight.
"Leland, Rob" wrote:
>
> It
How about Portlet? When I look at the features that's the first thing that
comes to mind.
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New name for Components / Extended Templates?
What name wo
It would be nice if struts could be extended
without having to place new code under
the org.apache.struts.action classes,
but just by dropping a separate jar file
under some directory that would self-register.
So what is the best way to extend struts
so that it stays lean ?
When I bro
What name would make sense to you, Jonathan?
Jonathan wrote:
>
> Please just make the name something that makes sense. Something that
> implies its function.
Please just make the name something that makes sense. Something that
implies its function.
- Original Message -
From: "Deadman, Hal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:22 AM
Subject: RE: New name for Components / Extended Templates?
> I agree w
It's like the old advice for writers -- write what you know ;0)
Open source developing is about "scratching an itch". The time to start
contributing to a Jakarta subproject is when you find something that
doesn't work the way you like, and it bothers you enough to fix it.
For more, see this
<
I agree with Martin. I had thought of bricks too but I think blocks is
somewhat related to the struts theme and doesn't have the negative
conotations of bricks.
People that are already using the existing components code can continue to
use it under it's current name. Changing the name inside stru
Hello all, I apologize for this message, I just wanted to get involved in
jakarta. I have read the documents on the web. I just wanted to know which
project you think would be a good one that is not too difficult that I can
start helping on???
Thanks
Rog
--
__
Hi,
The Bug Reporting System dosn't seem to be working so hope you don't mind me
logging it this way.
There appears to be a bug in the File Upload fucntionality of Struts 1.0
Final Release.
After uploading a file and doing a binary compare of the original file and
the one uploaded, the files ar
Hello Martin,
Thursday, June 28, 2001, 6:08:40 AM, you wrote:
MC> Oleg,
MC> (Yes, I know this is an old post, I'm replying to - work is getting in the
MC> way these days. ;-) )
MC> I guess I need some help in understanding how this works. Could you give a
MC> brief description of the ideas beh
21 matches
Mail list logo
