Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

Mike C wrote: I'm sticking with v1.1.18 because of the add ons (mainly RoboForm). I'd be curious to see how many of you are also sticking with v1.1.18 for the time being. Reasons?? No overwhelming reason to use the new versions. I have no desire to use the latest and greatest O/S, broswer, o

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:38:55 -0800, NoOp wrote: >> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:47:06 -0400, KristleBawl >> wrote: >> >>> >Open about:config (type it in your address bar and press Enter) >>> >Proceed past the warning. Right-click somewhere in the list, and choose >>> >New > Boolean. Enter network.p

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Rufus wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/31/2010 12:35 PM, Rufus wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I don't understand why people complains about installing SM as a browser-only. If they don't want the mail or the new

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:49:24 +0800, Philip Chee wrote: > Hi! > > I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this > public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it > to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors. > Since I don't norm

Re: Ping Q . . . Claws Mail

In , BJ wrote: > Hey Q, > > Why do you use Claws mail instead of TB or SM? What features does it > have that they don't? (I'm assuming that you use it for features > that SM or TB don't have . . . or is it just "personal preference"?) I have

Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Hi! I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors. Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even with SeaMonkey 1.1 I haven't tested that

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Phillip Jones wrote the following on 01-30-2010 10:28 AM: Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote: BeeNeR wrote: Absolutely. That is just one of the reasons I've used Netscape, Mozilla, and now SeaMonkey. Yes. When did the integration take place? Netscape version 3.0 or so? The first version I used was

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

On 02/01/2010 06:47 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 02/01/2010 06:10 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: >> Philip Chee wrote: >>> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:12:13 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: > Its JavaScript not Java. Java is pretty secure now. Actually, Java isn't more secure than J

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

On 02/01/2010 06:10 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:12:13 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: >>> Phillip Jones wrote: Its JavaScript not Java. Java is pretty secure now. >>> >>> Actually, Java isn't more secure than JavaScript, it's just that Java >>> isn't use

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Rufus wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/31/2010 12:35 PM, Rufus wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I don't understand why people complains about installing SM as a browser-only. If they don't want the mail or the news parts in SM,

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

Philip Chee wrote: On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:12:13 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Its JavaScript not Java. Java is pretty secure now. Actually, Java isn't more secure than JavaScript, it's just that Java isn't used that much any more - Really? Perhaps you should tell Google t

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Ray_Net wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I just read and understand: "So if you have a mailto link viewed in the Seamonkey browser, you can click on it and it did not opens your non-Seamonkey e-mail client" I can't remember saying that. Exact, i just asked you ... in other words .

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: /snip/ Phillip, I would be careful about making statements that you cannot backup, it will damage your credibility.

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Rufus wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Rufus wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/31/2010 12:35 PM, Rufus wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I don't understand why people complains about installing SM as a browser-only. If they don't want the mail or the news parts in SM, they can use their pr

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: /snip/ Phillip, I would be careful about making statements that you cannot backup, it will damage your credibility.

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

On 02/01/2010 05:41 PM, Leonidas Jones wrote: > Phillip Jones wrote: ... >> As you know, I don't do tabs. >> > > Well, then how the heck do you know its 10 times faster??? And this has *what* to do with this thread? Come on... Phillip has already been asked to start a *new* thread regarding his t

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: /snip/ Phillip, I would be careful about making statements that you cannot backup, it will damage your credibility. 10 times faster? Come o

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Benoit Renard wrote: Rufus wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/31/2010 12:35 PM, Rufus wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I don't understand why people complains about installing SM as a browser-only. If they don't want the mail or the news parts in SM, they can use their preferred ones.

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: I have tabs turned off for now. But everything opens in new windows (which is better than tabs.) I'd like for it to re-use the current window. I know on SM 1.1.18

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: I have tabs turned off for now. But everything opens in new windows (which is better than tabs.) I'd like for it to re-use the current window. I know on SM 1.1.18 there were certain site

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

»Q« wrote: In, Leonidas Jones wrote: »Q« wrote: I've installed a browser-only SM 2.0.2. To get mailto links working, I had to edit my profile's mimeTypes.rdf, but it works. Okay, how did you install it browser only? I'm using and OS, G

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

Philip Chee wrote: On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:12:13 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Its JavaScript not Java. Java is pretty secure now. Actually, Java isn't more secure than JavaScript, it's just that Java isn't used that much any more - Really? Perhaps you should tell Google t

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

On 01/31/2010 08:53 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 01/31/2010 12:13 PM, Benoit Renard wrote: ... >> >> He's referring to the now missing "Browser only" install option. > > OK. Let's see... Firefox (linux) is a 9.4Mb download, SeaMonkey (linux) > is 13Mb. Let's just suppose one want's to use Thunderbird as

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:12:13 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Phillip Jones wrote: >> Its JavaScript not Java. Java is pretty secure now. > > Actually, Java isn't more secure than JavaScript, it's just that Java > isn't used that much any more - Really? Perhaps you should tell Google that because t

Re: Printing passwords in V 2

Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:03:50 -0600, George Carden wrote: BeeNeR wrote: On or about 1/31/2010 10:58 AM, George Carden typed the following: The old ways I am aware of for printing a list of passwords from the Password Manager don't seem to work in SeaMonkey V2. This link desc

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Its JavaScript not Java. Java is pretty secure now. Actually, Java isn't more secure than JavaScript, it's just that Java isn't used that much any more - and that Java runs in its own binary as a plugin and so it's the Java Runtime developers' job to m

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Rufus wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/31/2010 12:35 PM, Rufus wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I don't understand why people complains about installing SM as a browser-only. If they don't want the mail or the news parts in SM, they can use their preferred ones. The problem with 2.0.

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

Ant wrote: On 1/30/2010 4:50 PM PT, Mike C typed: I'm sticking with v1.1.18 because of the add ons (mainly RoboForm). I'd be curious to see how many of you are also sticking with v1.1.18 for the time being. Reasons?? I moved to v2.0.2 for speed and memory usage. I did have to sacrifice a fe

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

On 1/30/2010 4:50 PM PT, Mike C typed: I'm sticking with v1.1.18 because of the add ons (mainly RoboForm). I'd be curious to see how many of you are also sticking with v1.1.18 for the time being. Reasons?? I moved to v2.0.2 for speed and memory usage. I did have to sacrifice a few minor exte

Two Problems after Migration to Seamonkey2.x

Hi, A): the info-msg after download of emails appears less than one second. I lost already control over downloaded emails and found them days later. Q: what can I do that this msg remains until next user action starts. B): I am the -only-user of the desktop. Q: How can i prevent either the p

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

Phillip Jones wrote: Its JavaScript not Java. Java is pretty secure now. Actually, Java isn't more secure than JavaScript, it's just that Java isn't used that much any more - and that Java runs in its own binary as a plugin and so it's the Java Runtime developers' job to make things secure,

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Robert Kaiser wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I just read and understand: "So if you have a mailto link viewed in the Seamonkey browser, you can click on it and it did not opens your non-Seamonkey e-mail client" I can't remember saying that. Exact, i just asked you ... in other words ... Is it possible

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: I have tabs turned off for now. But everything opens in new windows (which is better than tabs.) I'd like for it to re-use the current window. I know on SM 1.1.18 there were certain sites that forced new wind

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Ray_Net wrote: I just read and understand: "So if you have a mailto link viewed in the Seamonkey browser, you can click on it and it did not opens your non-Seamonkey e-mail client" I can't remember saying that. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mai

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: I have tabs turned off for now. But everything opens in new windows (which is better than tabs.) I'd like for it to re-use the current window. I know on SM 1.1.18 there were certain sites that forced new windows. but most would re

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

In , Leonidas Jones wrote: > »Q« wrote: > > I've installed a browser-only SM 2.0.2. To get mailto links > > working, I had to edit my profile's mimeTypes.rdf, but it works. > > Okay, how did you install it browser only? I'm using and OS, Gent

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

John Doue wrote: On 2/1/2010 12:26 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/31/2010 8:09 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: Just want to keep making the point not everyone desires tabs. And make sure us people that don't, have the ability to customize the way we want. I may be the only one on th

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

NoOp wrote: On 01/31/2010 08:09 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: »Q« wrote: In, Phillip Jones wrote: If they want the silly tabs. Fine. If it makes people giddy using them That's fine as well Just please keep a way to turn the tab nonsense off. You

Re: Printing passwords in V 2

On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:03:50 -0600, George Carden wrote: > BeeNeR wrote: >> On or about 1/31/2010 10:58 AM, George Carden typed the following: >>> The old ways I am aware of for printing a list of passwords from the >>> Password Manager don't seem to work in SeaMonkey V2. >>> >>> This link describe

Re: Printing passwords in V 2

On or about 2/1/2010 12:33 AM, George Carden typed the following: > BeeNeR wrote: >> On or about 1/31/2010 12:03 PM, George Carden typed the following: >>> BeeNeR wrote: On or about 1/31/2010 10:58 AM, George Carden typed the following: > The old ways I am aware of for printing a list of p

quite

quite ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Goodbye Seamonkey

On 2/1/2010 12:26 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/31/2010 8:09 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: Just want to keep making the point not everyone desires tabs. And make sure us people that don't, have the ability to customize the way we want. I may be the only one on the groups that does